Understanding Muonium Energy Levels and Relativistic Velocities

AI Thread Summary
Muonium, an atom made of a proton and a muon, has a more negative energy level in its first orbit compared to hydrogen due to the greater reduced mass of the muon. The energy level expression for hydrogen, E = -Rhc/n^2, indicates that a larger reduced mass increases R, resulting in a more negative energy value for muonium. The heavier muon requires more energy for the proton to maintain its orbit, which can help conceptualize this phenomenon. Additionally, the muon's velocity is approximately 14 times higher than that of an electron, raising questions about reaching relativistic speeds. The discussion also touches on the implications of binding multiple muons and the potential relativistic effects in such scenarios.
physgirl
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
A muonium is an atom consisting of a proton and a muon. A muon has the same charge as an electron but about 200x the mass of an electron. Conceptually, how does it make sense that the energy of the first orbit of a muonium is more negative than that of a hydrogen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physgirl said:
A muonium is an atom consisting of a proton and a muon. A muon has the same charge as an electron but about 200x the mass of an electron. Conceptually, how does it make sense that the energy of the first orbit of a muonium is more negative than that of a hydrogen?

Compare the the reduced mass of an electron in muonium to the reduced mass of an electron in hydrogen.
 
How does the expression for energy level of the hydrogen atom depend on the mass of the electron? How would you modify it for muonium?
 
Reduced mass for muonium is much greater than reduced mass for hydrogen...

And expression for energy level that I used was: E=-Rhc/n^2... but R depends directly on reduced mass, so the greater the reduced mass,the greater the R, and therefore the more negative the E...

But I guess I'm wondering how I can picture this in my head. Is it that since muons are heavier than electrons, the proton has to pull on the muon with greater energy to keep it orbiting there and therefore it has more energy? Can I think of it in those terms?
 


so does this mean the de broglie wavelength is 1/200th of that of an electron?

and the velocity is approx 14 times higher than that of an electron - and if so are we anywhere near relativistic speeds yet?

If two positive muons were bound to one negative muon in the same manner as a h2+ ion (basically an electron cloud separating two protons) what would the result be? would the velocities be relativistic?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top