Natural logarithm of negative numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the natural logarithm of negative numbers, specifically the equation ln(-1/2) = -ln(2) + iπ. Participants explain that the logarithm is a multivalued function, leading to the general formula ln(z) = ln|z| + i arg(z). They illustrate this by expressing -1/2 in terms of complex exponentials using Euler's formula. The conversation also touches on the shorthand "cis" for cos + i sin, highlighting its engineering roots. Overall, the thread explores the complexities of logarithmic functions in the complex plane.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
I'm puzzled by...

\ln \left( -\frac{1}{2} \right) = - \ln \left( 2 \right) + i \pi

Why is this true? How can I possibly get this result?

I know that

\ln \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) = - \ln \left( 2 \right).

Thank you so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Euler's formula and write "-1/2" in another way involving complex exponentials.Then apply "ln".

Daniel.
 
Technically, that's not true. ln is a multivalued function. In particular,

<br /> \ln -\frac{1}{2} = \ln \frac{1}{2} + i \pi (1 + 2n) \quad (n \in \mathbb{Z})<br />

Here is the general formula, which can be derived as Daniel suggests.

<br /> \ln z = \ln |z| + i \arg z<br />

(where the ln on the RHS is the ordinary real-valued logarithm)
 
Hurkyl,i was suggesting:

-\frac{1}{2}=-1 \cdot \frac{1}{2}

And of course:

-1=e^{i\pi (2n+1)} \ (n\in \mathbb{Z})

No need to know any definition,just Euler's formula...:-p

Daniel.
 
That makes sense! So, if

z=-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\mbox{ cis }\pi (2n+1) = \frac{1}{2} e^{i\pi (2n+1)}

Then

\ln z = \ln \left[ \frac{1}{2} e^{i\pi (2n+1)} \right] = -\ln 2\mbox{ } +\mbox{ } i\pi (2n+1) \qquad (n\in \mathbb{Z})

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Ha,that's interesting,u edited your message,yet u didn't see the typo "cis" instead of "cos"... :-p

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Ha,that's interesting,u edited your message,yet u didn't see the typo "cis" instead of "cos"... :-p

Daniel.

FYI, cis \theta is shorthand notation for \cos \theta + i \sin \theta. It's perfectly valid.
 
Hmmmmm...Interesting,even ingenious...

Daniel.
 
I haven't seen "cis" in years! (It's more engineer lingo than mathematics.)

(And both dextercioby's posts were clearly tongue in cheek.)
 
Back
Top