Net electric field and magnitude

AI Thread Summary
Three positive charges are arranged in a rectangle, with values of 3.0 nC, 7.0 nC, and 1.0 nC at specific corners. The electric field at the fourth corner is calculated using the contributions from the charges, yielding values of 6300 N/C in the x-direction and 2700 N/C in the y-direction. The challenge arises in determining the components of the electric field from the diagonal charge, which requires understanding the angle formed by the diagonal. The angle of the resultant electric field is found using the inverse tangent of the x and y components, but confusion exists regarding the correct measurement from the positive x-axis. The electric field direction is confirmed to point away from positive charges, contrasting with gravitational fields.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Three positive charges are arranged in a rectangle. The charge in the bottom left corner is 3.0 nC, in the top right corner is 7.0 nC, and in the bottom right corner it is 1.0 nC. The sides have a length of 0.10 m. Find the magnitude of the electric field at the fourth corner of the rectangle. Answer in units of N/C.

In the x-direction, the field is from the charge in the top right corner.
so k* 7 x 10^-9/.10^2 = 6300

In the y-direction, the field is from the charge in the bottom left corner.
so k* 3 x 10^-9/ .10^2 =2700

I know that the last charge needs to be broken up into components, but I'm not really sure how to do that. I know that the diagonal of the rectangle is .141 m, and that would be the distance from the point to the charge, but I always get confused on which angle to use. Help please??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to think of r as a position vector. Your rectangle is a square, so the angle the diagonal makes with respect to any of the sides is 45 degrees.
 
ok I got that part.. thanks
The second part says,
What is the direction of this electric field ( as an angle between -180 and 180 measured from the positive x-axis with counterclockwise positive)? Answer in units of degrees.

I know that to find the angle, you take the inverse tangent of the x and y components.
so tan^-1 (3021.1/6620.1) = 24.5 degrees.
This is wrong. I don't really understand how they are measuring direction from the x-axis. Can someone help me with how to get my answer to fit? Or am I doing it completely wrong?
 
The Electric Field points AWAY from positive charges ...
(unlike the gravitational Field, which points TOWARD positive masses).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top