Net Electric Field due to 2 different charges

AI Thread Summary
To find the point where the net electric field is zero between two charges of 0.600 nC and 9.60 nC separated by 1.60 m, the electric fields created by each charge must be equal. The user attempted to set the electric fields equal using the formula E = kq/r^2 but arrived at an unreasonable distance of 9.58 m. The discussion suggests setting up an algebraic relation to balance the electric fields, indicating a need for a more accurate approach to determine the correct distance. Additionally, the impact of a negative charge on the net electric field's zero point is raised, implying a different calculation method may be necessary. A clearer understanding of the relationship between the charges and their distances is essential for solving the problem correctly.
Ahmad1129
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A. Two particles having charges of 0.600 nC and 9.60 nC are separated by a distance of 1.60 m. At what point along the line connecting the two charges is the net electric field due to the two charges equal to zero?

B. Where would the net electric field be zero if one of the charges were negative?

Homework Equations



E= kq/r^2 k= 8.99X10^9

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really lost about where to start. Using the two charges and distance of 1.6m, I calculated the electric field to be 2.03X10^-8 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can imagine that in between the two particles, there's a point at which the influence of one particle exactly balances that of the other. Call the distance from this point to the 0.6 nC charge "d". Can you set up an algebraic relation that states "this charge must create the same electric field as this other charge"?
 
so, should I set the electric fields due to each charge equal to each other and solve for d?

maybe, E1= kq1/d^2, E2=kq2/d^2 and so kq1/d^2=kq2/d^2 and d=square root(kq1+kq2)

I did this, but I get d to be 9.58 m, which doesn't sound reasonable

Is there a better way of doing this?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top