Net Electric Field Strength at a Point due to a Uniform Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
A uniform electric field of 3600 N/C directed in the positive x-direction exists in the x, y plane, with a point charge of -9.8 × 10^-9 C located at the origin. The net electric field at y = +0.20 m must consider contributions from both the uniform electric field and the point charge. The uniform field contributes solely in the x-direction, while the point charge generates a field that acts radially, contributing only in the y-direction at that point. The total electric field is calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, combining the x and y components. Despite following this method, the final answer was reported as incorrect.
slaw155
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform electric field exists everywhere in the x, y plane. This electric field has a magnitude of 3600 N/C and is directed in the positive x direction. A point charge -9.8 × 10-9 C is placed at the origin. Find the magnitude of the net electric field at y = +0.20 m.

Homework Equations


E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought at first because the the y-direction is perpendicular to the electric field direction that the field strength would be 0, but this is wrong. I then thought the field would be the same at that point i.e. be 3600N/C, but that was wrong too. So how do I correctly solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that you have two contributions to the electric field here. One from the uniform field and one from the added point charge.
 
So because the uniform field acts perpendicular to the field from the point charge, the electric field at y=0.2m would be just the electric field from the point charge alone? Is my understanding correct?
 
slaw155 said:
So because the uniform field acts perpendicular to the field from the point charge, the electric field at y=0.2m would be just the electric field from the point charge alone? Is my understanding correct?

That's not quite right. The electric field at the location y = 0.2 m, is \mathrm{(3600 \ N/C)} \hat a_x plus whatever the electric field is from the point charge. (In my notation, I am using \hat a_x as the unit vector pointing in the x direction.)

Don't forget that they are vectors. (Don't merely sum the magnitudes.) [Edit: Hint: you need to break up each, individual electric field into its components, then you may sum the corresponding components of the individual fields.]
 
So 3600N/C field acts in the x-axis direction, and the field from the point charge acts in all directions with a value of (9x10^9 x 9.8 x 10^-9)/0.2^2. So what I do is add these two together to find the total electric field in the x-axis direction (let this sum be A), and the field in the y-axis direction is just the field from the point charge (let this sum be B). And then I can use Pythagoras' formula here to say total electric field at y=0.2m = square root of (A^2+B^2). Is this now correct?
 
slaw155 said:
So what I do is add these two together to find the total electric field in the x-axis direction

No, does the point charge give a field component in the x direction?
 
Doesn't the point charge give a field in all directions?
 
It gives a field pointing in the radial direction. Along the y-axis, the radial direction is the y-axis and therefore the point charge does not give any component in the x-direction.
 
Oh I see. So basically letting A= field due to point charge (which is in y-axis direction) and B = field due to field in x-axis direction, because they are at right angles to each other net electric field at y=0.2m = square root of [ [(9x10^9 x 9.8x10^-9)/(0.2^2)]^2 + (3600^2)]?
 
  • #10
That would be the correct idea, yes.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
That would be the correct idea, yes.

The answer still came out wrong?
 
Back
Top