Net External Electric Field from Combining Positive & Negative Charges

AI Thread Summary
The net external electric field from a positively charged wire inside a negatively charged cylinder can be determined using Gauss' law, which requires calculating the enclosed charge by combining the charges of both objects. If the total charge sums to zero, there will be no external electric field. The distance between the wire and the cylinder affects the interaction of their electric fields; close proximity leads to a combined field, while significant distance results in the fields acting independently. Since electric fields are vector quantities, they cannot be simply added as scalars; the charges must be combined to accurately calculate the net external field. Therefore, to find the net external electric field, one must consider both the magnitude and direction of the combined charges.
colonel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Suppose there is a positively charged wire inside a negatively charged cylinder. What would be the net external electric field? Would I first need to combine the charges, or can I just combine the separate fields?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
colonel said:
Suppose there is a positively charged wire inside a negatively charged cylinder. What would be the net external electric field? Would I first need to combine the charges, or can I just combine the separate fields?
You would draw a Gausian cylinder around the charged cylinder and determine the enclosed charge. Then you would apply Gauss' law to determine the flux through that surface:

\oint E\cdot dA = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}[/itex]<br /> <br /> where q is the enclosed charge. To find q, just add the charges (negative subtracts from positive). If they sum to 0, there is no external field. <br /> <br /> Since E would be the same at all points on the Gausian surface, and since the area of the cylinder is A = 2\pi RL the external field E would be:<br /> <br /> E = \frac{q}{2\pi\epsilon_0RL}<br /> <br /> AM
 

The net external electric field in this scenario would depend on the distance between the wire and the cylinder, as well as the magnitude of the charges on each object. If the wire and cylinder are close enough, the electric fields from the positive and negative charges would interact and create a combined field. However, if the distance between the objects is significant, then the electric fields would not interact and the net external field would simply be the sum of the individual fields.

To calculate the net external electric field, you would need to combine the charges and calculate the resulting field. This is because the electric field is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction. The individual fields from the positive and negative charges would have different directions, and thus cannot simply be added together as scalar quantities.

In summary, to determine the net external electric field from combining positive and negative charges, you would need to combine the charges and calculate the resulting field. Simply adding the individual fields would not give an accurate representation of the net field.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top