Net Force at the Bottom of Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the net force at the bottom of a vertical circular motion scenario involving a 2kg object. It clarifies that the net force at the bottom is the centripetal force, which is calculated using the formula Fnet = mv^2/r. Participants emphasize that while gravitational force acts downward, the tension in the stick must be considered when determining the net force. The correct relationship is established as Fnet = T - mg = mv^2/r, where T represents the tension. Ultimately, the net force is derived from the balance of these forces at the bottom of the motion.
marvolo1300
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is being swung vertically on a stick. What is the net force at the bottom?

The mass of the object = 2kg.
g= 9.81ms-1.
v = 6ms-1 at the bottom.



Homework Equations


F= mg
Fcentripetal = (m*v^2)/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I just need to know if i must add the force of gravity to the centripetal force.


Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks anyways. I solved it.

For anyone that is looking for an answer:

Yes, you must add the centripetal force to the force of gravity. This is because the centripetal force in this example is found through the velocity, rather than through the acceleration due to gravity.
 
But the net force at the bottom IS the centripetal force, mv^2/r. You don't add anything to it to get the net force, which is what the problem seems to be asking.
 
Thank you PhantomJay.

The centripetal force in this problem is provided by the tension of the string and also the force of gravity.

So, Fnet = m*g + (m*v^2)/r
 
marvolo1300 said:
Thank you PhantomJay.

The centripetal force in this problem is provided by the tension of the string and also the force of gravity.
yes, correct
So, Fnet = m*g + (m*v^2)/r
No, that is not correct. Fnet = mv^2/r

The gravity force acts down, and the tension in the wood stick acts up. And the centripetal force acts up toward the center of the circle.

Shoudn't it be

F_{net} = T - mg = mv^2/r ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top