Neutron star's angular velocity

AI Thread Summary
A neutron star forms when a star collapses into a dense object primarily composed of neutrons, with a density approximately 10^14 times that of ordinary matter. The discussion centers on calculating the angular speed of the neutron star after its collapse, assuming conservation of mass and angular momentum. The initial radius of the star is 7.0 x 10^5 km, and after collapse, it shrinks to 16 km. The angular speed before the collapse is derived from its rotation period of 30 days, leading to a calculation of the neutron star's angular speed using the ratio of moments of inertia. The final correct angular speed calculation reveals a significant increase in rotation rate post-collapse, emphasizing the conservation principles at play.
MAPgirl23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Under some circumstances, a star can collapse into an extremely dense
object made mostly of neutrons and called a neutron star. The density of a
neutron star is roughly 10^14 times as great as that of ordinary solid
matter. Suppose we represent the star as a uniform, solid, rigid sphere,
both before and after the collapse. The star`s initial radius was 7.0 x
10^5 km (comparable to our sun); its final radius is 16 km.

If the original star rotated once in 30 days, find the angular speed of
the neutron star in rad/s
-------------------------------------------------------------------

** I think you need to make two assumptions to answer this question. The first assumption is that the mass of the star is the same after collapse as before. The second assumption is that the angular momentum of the star is the same after the collapse as before (angular momentum is conserved, but if the star had, for example, ejected matter during its collapse, the ejecta could have carried away some of its angular momentum).

If the moments of interia of the sphere before and after collapse are I_1 and I_2 respectively, and its angular speeds before and after colapse are w_1 and w_2 then from our second assumption we have:

(I_1)(w_1) = (I_2)(w_2)
=> w_2 = (I_1)(w_1)/(I_2)

You are given w_1 (you are are told that the star rotates once in 30 days before the collapse). And although you do not know I_1 and I_2 directly, you can find their ratio, because each one is proportional to the mass of the star and the square of its radius. From our first assumption the mass of the star is constant, so

(I_1)/(I_2) = (R_1)^2/(R_2)^2

where R_1 is the radius of the start before collapse, and R_2 is the radius after collapse. So

w_2 = (w_1)(R_1)^2/(R_2)^2

now using my logic I got
(R_1)^2/(R_2)^2 = (7.0 x 10^5)^2/(16)^2 = 1.914 x 10^9
w_1 = 1 rotation/2.592 x 10^6 sec = 3.85 x 10^-7

so: If the original star rotated once in 30 days, find the angular speed of the neutron star. 738.4 rad/s which was wrong.

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MAPgirl23 said:
w_1 = 1 rotation/2.592 x 10^6 sec = 3.85 x 10^-7

This bit is where you've gone wrong. It should be:

\omega_{1} = \frac{2\pi}{T}, where T is your orbital period, ie 2.592 x 10^6 s.
 
MAPgirl23 said:
. The density of a
neutron star is roughly 10^14 times as great as that of ordinary solid
matter

Shouldn't you use the above information below?

MAPgirl23 said:
(I_1)/(I_2) = (R_1)^2/(R_2)^2
 
MAPgirl23 said:
Under some circumstances, a star can collapse into an extremely dense
object made mostly of neutrons and called a neutron star. The density of a
neutron star is roughly 10^14 times as great as that of ordinary solid
matter. Suppose we represent the star as a uniform, solid, rigid sphere,
both before and after the collapse. The star`s initial radius was 7.0 x
10^5 km (comparable to our sun); its final radius is 16 km.

If the original star rotated once in 30 days, find the angular speed of
the neutron star in rad/s
-------------------------------------------------------------------

** I think you need to make two assumptions to answer this question. The first assumption is that the mass of the star is the same after collapse as before. The second assumption is that the angular momentum of the star is the same after the collapse as before (angular momentum is conserved, but if the star had, for example, ejected matter during its collapse, the ejecta could have carried away some of its angular momentum).

If the moments of interia of the sphere before and after collapse are I_1 and I_2 respectively, and its angular speeds before and after colapse are w_1 and w_2 then from our second assumption we have:

(I_1)(w_1) = (I_2)(w_2)
=> w_2 = (I_1)(w_1)/(I_2)

You are given w_1 (you are are told that the star rotates once in 30 days before the collapse). And although you do not know I_1 and I_2 directly, you can find their ratio, because each one is proportional to the mass of the star and the square of its radius. From our first assumption the mass of the star is constant, so

(I_1)/(I_2) = (R_1)^2/(R_2)^2

where R_1 is the radius of the start before collapse, and R_2 is the radius after collapse. So

w_2 = (w_1)(R_1)^2/(R_2)^2

now using my logic I got
(R_1)^2/(R_2)^2 = (7.0 x 10^5)^2/(16)^2 = 1.914 x 10^9
w_1 = 1 rotation/2.592 x 10^6 sec = 3.85 x 10^-7

so: If the original star rotated once in 30 days, find the angular speed of the neutron star. 738.4 rad/s which was wrong.

What did I do wrong?

What's the correct answer suppose to be? I got 4632 rad/sec.

I see where you went wrong. You got the right answer, but not the right units. You have 1 revolution/sec... multiply your answer by 2pi...
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I see what I did.
 
Wait a minute. How can you say that the mass of the star is conserved? What happened to all the protons (and the electrons) in the star?

Initially you have M1=[4/3(pi)(r_1)^3] X (D1) and M2=[4/3(pi)(r_2)^3] X (D2) .
Since the ratio D1/D2 is given, by substituting the above values, you can get the ratio
I1/I2.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top