Newton's 2nd law in circular motion

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about Newton's 2nd law in circular motion, participants focus on the dynamics of a car negotiating a banked curve at Daytona International Speedway. The key calculations yield a centripetal acceleration of 5.89 m/s² and a speed of 43.1 m/s. The confusion arises regarding the use of cosine for the normal force in circular motion, as opposed to sine in linear motion. It is clarified that the angle of the bank affects the components of the forces, with cosine corresponding to the vertical component due to the orientation of the banking. Understanding the diagram and the angle labeled is crucial for determining which trigonometric function to use for future problems.
miamiphysics42
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Daytona International Speedway in Florida. Both of its courses feature four story, 31.0 degree banked curves with max radius of 316 if a car negotiates the curve too slowly it tends to slip down the incline of the turn whearas if it going too fast it may begin to slide up the incline. find the centripetal acceleration on the curve so won't slip up or down and calculate the speed (neglect friction

Homework Equations



F=ma
v^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I have the solution it is 5.89 m/s^2 and 43.1 m/s, but i don't understand why the normal force uses cos. It says use the y-component of Newton's second law to solve for the normal force n...so why am I supposed to use cos instead of sin and how can I know for future problems that are similar?

ma= F = n + mg
ncostheta -mg = 0
n= mg/ costheta
F = mg tan theta
centripetal acceleration = g*tan*theta

then v^2/r = 43.1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am having trouble understanding why cos is the y-component of New's second law in regards to solving for the normal force of a problem regarding circular motion (car on a banked racetrack) and in linear motion the y-component of Newton's second law was sin. How do I know whether the y component pertains to cos or sin for a circular problem or if it is always cos then why??
 
You have to look at which angle you have labelled. Do you have a specific question?
 
Thanks to whoever combined these.

miamiphysics42 said:
I have the solution it is 5.89 m/s^2 and 43.1 m/s, but i don't understand why the normal force uses cos. It says use the y-component of Newton's second law to solve for the normal force n...so why am I supposed to use cos instead of sin and how can I know for future problems that are similar?
If you draw a diagram it should become apparent. The curve is banked at 30 degrees, so calculating the y component of the weight you will need to use cosine.

Try drawing the diagram, then if you are still stuck ask away.
 
I can't seem to upload the paint picture I drew, but the components as they are drawn in in the book are a vertical line with n cos theta at the top arrow and -mg straight down from it and n sin theta horizontal and pointing to the left and the angle of the road is to the left of the picture. If I was to put these components on an axis it seems like the components of the normal force should be switched with sin corresponding to the y direction. (In linear motion sin was always in the y direction why does it seem different, what am I missing or what I'm I not seeing?) Thanks for your help!
 
http://books.google.com/books?id=wD...ts=fnlv24PLT5&sig=GaX-fnjm4Nv6qe0MtuNgwZEzEVo
has the problem, i don't understand the component diagram to the right of the car, it seems like if you line the axis up with the gravity component on the vertical axis then the normal force you should be using is n sin theta...before without the circular motion it was always mg sin of theta for the y-direction and ramps why do we now use cos for the y-direction doesn't sin always correspond to the y direction?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top