Newton's Law of Gravitation (again)

Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

a). Four particles, each of mass m , are situated at the vertices of a regular tetrahedron of side a. Find the Gravational force exerted on anyone of the particles by the other three

b) Three uniform rigid spheres of mass M and radius a are placed on a horizontal table and are pressed together so that their centres are at the vertices of an equilateral triangle. A fourth uniform rigid sphere of mass M and radius a is placed on top of the other three so that all four spheres are in contact with each other. Find the gravitational force exerted on the upper phere by the three lowers one

Homework Equations



Possible F=m1*m2*G/R^2

F(net)=F1+F2+F3+F4

The Attempt at a Solution



part a)
What is really going to be difficult for me to calculate is the distance between the mass that lies on top of the vertices and the of one of the three masses that lies on the three vertices of the equilateral triangle; the base of the tetrahedron is an equilateral triangle since the polyhedron is a regular tetrahedron.

attempting calculation at height: since triangle is equilateral, angles will be 60 degrees each. I draw a line segment that bisects one of the four equilateral triangles: therefore a breaks into two segments of a/2. I also consider that a*cos(30)= a*root(3)/2 . using the pythagorean theorem my Radius should be: R=Root((a*root(3)/2)^2 +(a/2)^2)=Root(3*a^2+a^2/4)) ; that isn't right .What other method should I apply to obtain the radius.

part b) Almost the same as above: h=a*root(3)/2 ; therefore R=root((3/4)*a+(3/4)*a)=.5*root(6*a) ; still wrong

how is part b different from part a , other than the fact that the masses of part b have a spherical shape.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part a, the centers of each pair of masses is separated by distance a. Remember that gravitational force is a vector, so one needs to look at horizontal (parallel with the plane of three mass) and vertical (perpendicular with plane of three mass) components of the resultant force vector.

What is the implication of part a and part b giving the same answer?
 
Astronuc said:
In part a, the centers of each pair of masses is separated by distance a. Remember that gravitational force is a vector, so one needs to look at horizontal (parallel with the plane of three mass) and vertical (perpendicular with plane of three mass) components of the resultant force vector.

What is the implication of part a and part b giving the same answer?
But wouldn't a tetrahedron be in a 3-d plane, so wouldn't I have to considered the x,y, and z components of the plane?
F=F1+F2+F3

Would F1 be: F1=m*m*G/(a*cos(60))^2+m*m*G/(a*sin(60))^2
since all 3 forces have the same masses, F net would look like:

F(net)= 3*(m*m*G/(a*cos(60))^2+m*m*G/(a*sin(60))^2)
 
Benzoate said:
But wouldn't a tetrahedron be in a 3-d plane, so wouldn't I have to considered the x,y, and z components of the plane?
F=F1+F2+F3

Would F1 be: F1=m*m*G/(a*cos(60))^2+m*m*G/(a*sin(60))^2
since all 3 forces have the same masses, F net would look like:

F(net)= 3*(m*m*G/(a*cos(60))^2+m*m*G/(a*sin(60))^2)

was my last response not understandable?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top