Nodal analysis- Current directions for KCL

AI Thread Summary
In nodal analysis, after labeling nodes, the direction of currents can be assigned arbitrarily. The key principle is that the sum of currents entering a node must equal the sum of currents leaving it, as per Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL). If a current is calculated as negative, it indicates that the actual direction is opposite to the assigned direction. It is recommended to focus on writing KCL equations for each node without worrying about labeling current directions throughout the entire network. This approach simplifies the process and leads to accurate results for node voltages and subsequent current directions.
Neon32
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
In node analysis, after labeling the nodes. I don't know how to choose currents direction to apply KCL. it seems too complicated.. and I end up every time getting different answers the the solution sheet. I've an exam tomorrow. would be much appreciated if you could help me better understand the current directions and signs convention related to it.

Here is an example of a node voltage analysis problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assign whatever current directions you want. For every node the sum of currents in must be equal to the sum of currents going out. You may find that some currents become negative. That just means the current goes in the direction opposite to what you assigned.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Neon32 said:
Here is an example of a node voltage analysis problem
Wow, that's incredible!

J/K, nothing got Uploaded. :smile:

Anyway, the best way to use the KCL equations (at least for me) is just to write them as the sum of all currents leaving each identified node is zero. That's real and physical, and easy to remember. Does that work for you?

You don't end up labeling the currents with directions in the overall network, you just apply that KCL rule at each node that you want to write the equations for. Once you have solved for the node voltages using the KCL equations, that gives you the final element currents and directions.
 
berkeman said:
Wow, that's incredible!

J/K, nothing got Uploaded. :smile:

Anyway, the best way to use the KCL equations (at least for me) is just to write them as the sum of all currents leaving each identified node is zero. That's real and physical, and easy to remember. Does that work for you?

You don't end up labeling the currents with directions in the overall network, you just apply that KCL rule at each node that you want to write the equations for. Once you have solved for the node voltages using the KCL equations, that gives you the final element currents and directions.

Oh got it. Thanks, appreciated.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top