Nodal Voltage Analysis: Correcting an Error in Circuit Solution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around correcting errors in nodal voltage analysis equations for a circuit. Participants are focused on identifying mistakes in the equations provided by the original poster and clarifying how to properly formulate the node equations. The context is primarily homework-related and involves technical reasoning about circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about which of their three equations is incorrect and seeks assistance in identifying the errors.
  • One participant asserts that only equation (2) is correct and implies that equations (1) and (3) contain mistakes.
  • The same participant provides hints for correcting equations (1) and (3), noting that equation (1) has a duplicate term and an extraneous term involving nodes 2 and 3.
  • For equation (3), the participant points out that it also has an incorrect number of terms and mentions that a term cancels another, suggesting that the current should only be accounted for once.
  • Another participant suggests a method for writing node equations by assuming all currents flow out of the node, which could simplify the formulation process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the specific corrections needed for equations (1) and (3), as the original poster has not confirmed the suggested changes. Multiple views on how to approach the corrections are presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not provided specific definitions or assumptions that might clarify the context of the equations. The discussion lacks resolution on the mathematical steps required to correct the equations.

alexmath
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I tried solving the following circuit using nodal analysis, but the answer I've got is wrong. Can you tell me please which one of these 3 equation is wrong? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • WP_20140330_23_02_59_Pro.jpg
    WP_20140330_23_02_59_Pro.jpg
    18.5 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
Please make use of the posting template when you begin a new thread.

Looks like only your equation (2) is a correct node equation.
 
Ok, sorry for that. Can you also tell me how the equation 1 and 3 should look like, in 3 days a have a test and I'm really really struggling understanding this.
 
I can't show you directly, but I can give you hints.

In your equation (1), note that node 1 has only three connections. So there should be just three terms in total, where you have four, and one of them is a duplicate of another while yet another involves nodes 2 and 3 alone for some reason...

In your equation (3), as above it has just three connections so there should be just three terms in total. The last term on the right cancels the term on the left hand side; you only want to account for a given current once. The middle term on the right side seems to involve a branch not even connected to node 3.

A simple way to write node equations is to simply assume that all currents are flowing out of the given node and write their sum. Let's say you want to write the equation for node 2 (for which you have a correct equation already). Then you could write it as:
$$\frac{V2 - 2 - V1}{2} + \frac{V2 - 4}{2} + \frac{V2 - V2}{2} = 0$$
The first term accounts for the current on the branch between nodes 2 and 1, the second term accounts for the current between node 2 and ground, while the third term accounts for the current between node 2 and node 3. That's all three connections accounted for.

The math will automatically take care of the current directions if you do it this way. No need to guess current directions in any branches. Simply assume that all currents are flowing outwards from the chosen node and that the sum of them will be zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K