Non-halogen fire retardant composite (Mgoh2 - Epoxy)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of Magnesium Hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) as a fire retardant in epoxy composites, particularly in comparison to aluminum trihydrate. Participants explore the results of fire testing, specifically under UL 94 vertical burn conditions, and the implications of varying the weight of additives in the composite.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports no fire retardancy effect from adding Magnesium Hydroxide to epoxy resin, raising questions about the underlying reasons.
  • Another participant inquires about the specific testing conditions, asking if the claim of zero flame retardancy is against a control sample.
  • A participant confirms the testing was under UL 94 vertical conditions and reiterates the lack of fire retardancy effect from Magnesium Hydroxide.
  • There is a suggestion to consider aluminum trihydrate as an alternative fire retardant.
  • One participant notes that while aluminum trihydrate shows good fire retardancy, their main research focuses on the combination of aluminum trihydrate and Magnesium Hydroxide, which reportedly does not yield the expected effects from Mg(OH)2.
  • A partner's research using unsaturated polyester resin indicates that a combination of Mg(OH)2 and aluminum trihydrate can enhance fire retardancy, suggesting that the effectiveness of Mg(OH)2 may depend on specific conditions or formulations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of Magnesium Hydroxide as a fire retardant, with some asserting it shows no effect while others suggest it may have a role when combined with other materials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which Mg(OH)2 may or may not contribute to fire retardancy.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in the research, including the specific formulations used, the weight percentages of additives, and the testing conditions that may influence the outcomes observed.

Faraj Sungkar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm currently doing research for my thesis about non halogen fire retardant composite. One of the main result is deviate and confusing because: There is no fire retardancy's effect of Magnesium Hydroxide addition to resin epoxy. Why?Any suggestions?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you doing UL burns? Horizontal or vertical? You're saying zero flame retardancy vs a control?
 
Yes it's UL 94 Vertical. There is no fire retardancy's effect or zero flame retardancy. The weight of Magnesium Hydroxide is varied based on total weight of composite
 
Have you tried aluminum trihydrate?
 
Yess, the fire retardancy's effect of aluminum trihydrate addition is pretty good.. My main research is actually combination between both aluminium trihydrate and Magnesium Hydroxide. But there is no effect of Mgoh2 addition..

My partner has done the similar research using unsaturated polyester resin, and the result shows that the combination of Mgoh2 and AlOH3 could increase the fire retardancy. But there is a role of Mgoh2 to improve fire retardancy, because around 10-30%wt of Mgoh2 was used.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
43
Views
23K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K