Non-Ideal Op-Amp gain derivation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
949
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


Problem statement is in the attachment HW 5, it is problem #1.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am just stuck with a whole bunch of variables and this just looks like a complete mess
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
The best and the easiest way to solve this circuit is to use a matrix. And then use the math software and allow the computer to solve the matrix for us.
See the example
 

Attachments

Your equations look right.

I have 2 suggestions:
1. Instead of R, use G=1/R for all resistances. Makes the math look cleaner by eliminating fractions in your two basic equations.
2. Put your basic equations into math software. Don't try to solve them yourself; you are liable to make a mistake.
 
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.
 
Last edited:
Maylis said:
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.

You must have made an error in your arithmetic. I get -99.9889 for the gain.
 
I do it over and over and get the same result, are you getting -9.99999E+24 on the top of the fraction, and 1.000E+17 on the bottom?
 
Here's the result I get:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67305&stc=1&d=1394099970.png
 

Attachments

  • Values.png
    Values.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 510
Maylis said:
I'm plugging in the numbers in your equation Jony, and my gain is many orders of magnitude greater than Rf/Rs.

I get -10^24 for the top part of the franction, then 10^16 on the bottom part, giving 10^6 as the gain. The gain for the ideal is 100.

Because I made a stupid mistake not in the matrix but in input 5. The gain is A times larger than is should. To correct this simply remove the first A in numerator

correct numerator = Ri RL (-A Rf+Ro) = Ri RL (Ro - Rf A)

Sorry for confusion.