Normal modes of diatomic linear chain

goulio
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm preparing for my condensed matter exam and I'm trying to solve problem 3a) of chapter 22 in Ashcroft & Mermin. The problem is basically to prove that the dispersion relation of a diatomic linear chain will reduce to the monoatomic one when the coupling constants are equal, K=G=K_0. Starting off with equation (22.37)
<br /> \omega^2 = \frac{K+G}{M} \pm \frac{1}{M}\sqrt{K^2 + G^2 + 2KG \cos k a}<br />
I get
<br /> \omega^2 = \frac{2 K_0}{M}(1 \pm | \cos \[(k a)/2 \] | )<br />
if we take the minus sign (and ignore the absolute value) we get back to the monoatomic result with a lattice constant of a/2. But why would prefer the minus sign and remove the absolute value?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check that for the relevant values of k, \cos{(ka/2)} is greater than zero hence you can drop the absolute value. The spectrum displays two branches, the branch with the negative sign is called the acoustic mode because for small k the frequency goes like \omega = c k. The other branch, obtained by choosing the plus sign, is called the optical mode because this mode is often excited by light in real materials. The frequency of the optical mode does not vanish as k tends to zero and this mode is not part of the low lying spectrum. In particular, it won't contribute to the specific heat at low temperatures because it can't be thermally excited.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top