Nortonization and nodal analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying nodal analysis to a circuit, where the user initially calculates an incorrect short-circuit current (Isc = 1/3 A). The error arises from incorrectly assuming the direction of current flow at a node involving a voltage source. The correct approach is to treat all branches without fixed currents as flowing out of the node. Additionally, if the polarity of the 12V voltage source is reversed, the expression in the nodal analysis changes from "V - 12" to "V + 12." Accurate application of these principles is essential for correct circuit analysis.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
72
Hi, :)

Please have a look on the following link:
http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1554/circuitmm.jpg

1: I was trying to solve a circuit. I was successful except the part where I was trying to apply the nodal analysis (it's at the very end of the linked scan). Where am I going wrong? By nodal analysis I get Isc = 1/3 A which is wrong. Where did I go wrong?

2: How would we proceed while applying nodal analysis if the 12V voltage source's polarities are reversed?

It would be very nice of you if you could help me with the above queries. Thanks

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PainterGuy said:
Hi, :)

Please have a look on the following link:
http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1554/circuitmm.jpg

1: I was trying to solve a circuit. I was successful except the part where I was trying to apply the nodal analysis (it's at the very end of the linked scan). Where am I going wrong? By nodal analysis I get Isc = 1/3 A which is wrong. Where did I go wrong?
In your third line,

2 + (V - 12)/4 - (V - 0)/16 = 0

For the voltage source branch you've made the assumption that the current will be flowing into the node, but you've written the term as if it is flowing out of the node.

It's generally easier to NOT make any assumptions about the current direction for branches that don't have fixed currents (like the one containing the 2A current source). Just assume that current is flowing out of the node for all such branches. So,

2A - I - Isc = 0

2A - (V - 12)/4 - (V - 0)/16 = 0

proceed...
2: How would we proceed while applying nodal analysis if the 12V voltage source's polarities are reversed?

The "V - 12" would become "V + 12".
 
Many, many thanks, gneill.

Cheers
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top