ODEs: Word problem involving (I think) phase lines

malenkylizard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the population y of rats on a farm at time t (in weeks) satisfies:
dy/dt = -y(y-100)/50
then how many rats per week should be killed to eradicate the population?


Homework Equations


None known.


The Attempt at a Solution


The ODE dy/dt is autonomous, so I can use a phase line.
I found the equilibrium points to be at y=0 and y=100, and found that for the interval 0<y<100, solutions were increasing, and for both the intervals 100<y<%infinity, and -%infinity<y<0, solutions were decreasing, but the third interval is probably undefined, since a negative population is not feasible.

And now I'm lost. I don't know what to do after I've worked this out! Thanks in advance for your hints.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We want to modify the population system by "harvesting" rats (as population dynamics people so delicately put it) in each "time step" so that the population y will be driven to zero for any initial population. As things stand now, y = 0 is an unstable equilibrium ( dy/dt > 0 ), repelling the population toward the stable equilibrium of y = 100 ( dy/dt > 0 for y < 100 , dy/dt < 0 for y > 100 ). So, after some time has passed, the farm should expect to have to cohabit with 100 rats.

We introduce a so-called "harvesting term" H which equals the number of rats per week we shall... okay, kill! The differential equation is now

\frac{dy}{dt} = \frac{y \cdot (y-100)}{50} - H .

If we graph this and pick some positive value like, say, H = 10 (exterminate 10 rats a week), we'll see that the equilibria have moved. The important thing is that now dy/dt < 0 at y = 0 , so this population level is now in an "attractive" region, instead of a "repelling" one. Unfortunately, there is still a stable (attracting) equilibrium at some positive y value. Unacceptable! What is the smallest value we can make H (remember, we have to keep an integer number of rats) so that dy/dt < 0 for any positive value of y . This will guarantee that for any initial rat population the farm has, the number of rats will ultimately fall to zero.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top