On (pentagon shaped) electric field question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of a regular pentagon with charges placed at its corners. The electric field equation E=q/(4∏ε0)(a^2) is mentioned, but the contributor suggests that simply summing the fields from the four corners is insufficient due to the pentagon's symmetry. They propose that the electric fields from the charges must be resolved into components to accurately determine the net electric field. The importance of symmetry in simplifying the calculations is emphasized, and the contributor refers to a diagram hosted on their blog for clarity. Ultimately, understanding vector decomposition is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
physikamateur
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four particles, each having a charge q are placed on the four corners A, B, C, D of a regular pentagon ABCDE. The distance of each corner from the centre is a. Find the electric field at the centre of the pentagon.


Homework Equations


E=q/(4∏ε0)(a^2) where k=1/4∏ε0

The Attempt at a Solution


Well certainly I think it's silly to just sum up four electric fields to give 4q/(4∏ε0)(a^2). I think it would seem obvious that there is a net electric field as shown in the attached diagram. Suppose E(E) exists. Then E(A)+E(B)+E(C)+E(D)+E(E)=0. My working is shown in the diagram attached. At the same time I am confused as how the electric field vectors resolves.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Darn, can't upload the diagrams. I've uploaded it on my random blog. Go to www.kcsuploads.blogspot.com and see pentagon diagram. Sorry for any inconvenience caused
 
Just add the vectors the way vectors add. Decompose them into their components in a convenient reference frame. Symmetry considerations will help set that up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top