One-Dimensional Box: Analyzing Butadiene's UV/VIS Spectrum

Mechdude
Messages
108
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



consider butadiene H_2 C = CH-CH=cH_2 and assume for simplicity that \pi electrons move on a straight line (one -dimensional box) whose length l can be estimated as equal to two C=C bond lengths (2*1.35 angstrom) , plus one C-C lengths. Butadiene has four \pi that fill the n=1 & n=2. the transition observed in a UV/VIS spectrum thus corresponds to the exitationof ane electron from the n = 3 state. Experimentally one finds that this corresponds to the absorption of light with a wavelengths of 217 nm. Compute and compare the lenghts of the 0ne-D box suggested by the sum of the bond length and by the energy of the transition.

Homework Equations



not sure

The Attempt at a Solution



not sure
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well what are the energy levels of a 1D well with length L?
 
E = \frac {n^2 h^2}{8 m l^2}
is that what I am to use?
If it is may be energy is calculated from E = hv
and the information given then equate that to the energy difference calculated between n=3 and n= 2 ,
if I am headed in the correct direction
 
Yes. You will want to find the L that gives that energy difference, and you will want to use the L given to you to find what energy difference that gets.
 
nickjer said:
Yes. You will want to find the L that gives that energy difference, and you will want to use the L given to you to find what energy difference that gets.

thanks, nickjer.
regards.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top