One more Quantum Matrix question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving two properties of a Hermitian matrix A using its orthonormal eigenvectors represented in matrix S. It is established that S is unitary, as it satisfies the condition S* S = I, indicating the orthogonality of its columns. The second point addresses the relationship between A and S, clarifying that the correct formulation is AS = SD, where D is a diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. This correction is crucial, as using DS would lead to incorrect off-diagonal entries. Overall, the focus is on understanding the properties of unitary matrices and the implications of eigenvector relationships in diagonalization.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Let A be a Hermitian nxn matrix. Let the column vectors of the nxn matrix S be comprised of the orthnormalized eigenvectors of A

Again, Sinv is the inverse of S

a) Show that S is unitary
b) Show that Sinv(A)S is a diagonal matrix comrpised of the eigenvalues of A

No idea how to start this one off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) U is a unitary matrix <=> U*U = I, where "*" denotes conjugate transpose <=> \sum_{j} u_{ji}^{*}u_{jk} = \delta_{ik} <=> u_{i}^{*}u_{k}=\delta_{ik}, where u_{i} is the ith column of U. The last relation implies orthogonality of columns of U.

b)This one needs a little thought. If u is an eigenvector of A, then Au=\lambda u. Then what is AS? Remember that each column of S is just an eigenvector of A. Also note that Sinv*S=I.
 
Last edited:
Wong said:
a) U is a unitary matrix <=> U*U = I, where "*" denotes conjugate transpose <=> \sum_{j} u_{ji}^{*}u_{jk} = \delta_{ik} <=> u_{i}^{*}u_{k}=\delta_{ik}, where u_{i} is the ith column of U. The last relation implies orthogonality of columns of U.

b)This one needs a little thought. If u is an eigenvector of A, then Au=\lambda u. Then what is AS? Remember that each column of S is just an eigenvector of A. Also note that Sinv*S=I.


Sorry, I am still not sure how to find AS without knowing the eigenvectors of A.
 
Ed Quanta said:
Sorry, I am still not sure how to find AS without knowing the eigenvectors of A.

First try to think about what you want to prove. That is, S^{-1}AS=D, where D is a diagonal matrix. This is equivalent to proving AS=DS, where D is diagonal. Now each column of S is an eigenvector of A. So A acting on S should produce something quite simple. (Try to think of what is the defining eigenvalue equation for A.) May you put the result in the form DS, where D is a diagonal matrix?
 
Wong Wrong

I have doubts that either of you guys will read this anytime soon. I had this same problem and the conclusion that Wong tried to provide is incorrect. Instead of AS=DS it's actually AS=SD. The product DS will produce the correct entries along the diagonal but false elsewhere (really think about what you're doing here). But if you use the produce SD it will provide the correct eigenvalue for every eigenvector.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...

Similar threads

Back
Top