One more Quantum Matrix question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Quantum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving two properties of a Hermitian matrix A using its orthonormal eigenvectors represented in matrix S. It is established that S is unitary, as it satisfies the condition S* S = I, indicating the orthogonality of its columns. The second point addresses the relationship between A and S, clarifying that the correct formulation is AS = SD, where D is a diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. This correction is crucial, as using DS would lead to incorrect off-diagonal entries. Overall, the focus is on understanding the properties of unitary matrices and the implications of eigenvector relationships in diagonalization.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Let A be a Hermitian nxn matrix. Let the column vectors of the nxn matrix S be comprised of the orthnormalized eigenvectors of A

Again, Sinv is the inverse of S

a) Show that S is unitary
b) Show that Sinv(A)S is a diagonal matrix comrpised of the eigenvalues of A

No idea how to start this one off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) U is a unitary matrix <=> U*U = I, where "*" denotes conjugate transpose <=> \sum_{j} u_{ji}^{*}u_{jk} = \delta_{ik} <=> u_{i}^{*}u_{k}=\delta_{ik}, where u_{i} is the ith column of U. The last relation implies orthogonality of columns of U.

b)This one needs a little thought. If u is an eigenvector of A, then Au=\lambda u. Then what is AS? Remember that each column of S is just an eigenvector of A. Also note that Sinv*S=I.
 
Last edited:
Wong said:
a) U is a unitary matrix <=> U*U = I, where "*" denotes conjugate transpose <=> \sum_{j} u_{ji}^{*}u_{jk} = \delta_{ik} <=> u_{i}^{*}u_{k}=\delta_{ik}, where u_{i} is the ith column of U. The last relation implies orthogonality of columns of U.

b)This one needs a little thought. If u is an eigenvector of A, then Au=\lambda u. Then what is AS? Remember that each column of S is just an eigenvector of A. Also note that Sinv*S=I.


Sorry, I am still not sure how to find AS without knowing the eigenvectors of A.
 
Ed Quanta said:
Sorry, I am still not sure how to find AS without knowing the eigenvectors of A.

First try to think about what you want to prove. That is, S^{-1}AS=D, where D is a diagonal matrix. This is equivalent to proving AS=DS, where D is diagonal. Now each column of S is an eigenvector of A. So A acting on S should produce something quite simple. (Try to think of what is the defining eigenvalue equation for A.) May you put the result in the form DS, where D is a diagonal matrix?
 
Wong Wrong

I have doubts that either of you guys will read this anytime soon. I had this same problem and the conclusion that Wong tried to provide is incorrect. Instead of AS=DS it's actually AS=SD. The product DS will produce the correct entries along the diagonal but false elsewhere (really think about what you're doing here). But if you use the produce SD it will provide the correct eigenvalue for every eigenvector.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top