Op Amp Circuit: Find Vo | Homework Statement & Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Studious_stud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Op amp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the output voltage Vo in an op-amp circuit, with the answer being -IR2. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding ideal op-amp analysis, including the two golden rules regarding voltage and current at the terminals. The conversation also touches on Thevenin and Norton transformations, with guidance on how to apply these concepts to analyze the circuit effectively. Steps for applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Ohm's Law to solve the circuit are outlined, highlighting the process of determining currents and voltages. Overall, the thread provides a collaborative approach to tackling circuit theory challenges, emphasizing foundational principles.
Studious_stud
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the output voltage Vo in the following circuit

33ym9hf.jpg

Homework Equations



V = IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Hey everyone, this question has me stumped. The answer to the question is -IR_2 but I'm interested as to how this answer comes about. I'm not particularly amazing at circuit theory

Thanks in advance everyone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, what sort of rules do you know about Ideal Op-Amp Analysis?

There are two golden rules which everyone should know, the first concerning the voltages at the + and - terminals and the second concerning the current at the + and - terminals.

Secondly, are you aware of Thevinin and Norton transform theories?

And lastly, you're right that you require Ohms Law, but the other two are more important.
 
Zryn said:
Firstly, what sort of rules do you know about Ideal Op-Amp Analysis?

There are two golden rules which everyone should know, the first concerning the voltages at the + and - terminals and the second concerning the current at the + and - terminals.

Secondly, are you aware of Thevinin and Norton transform theories?

And lastly, you're right that you require Ohms Law, but the other two are more important.

Ideal is infinite gain right?

v+ = v- = 0

i+ = i- = 0 as well

Yes I'm aware of Thevenin and Norton but not incredible at working them out...
 
Ideal is infinite gain right?

Yep!

v+ = v- = 0

i+ = i- = 0 as well

Correct!

Can you do the Thevinin transformation, finding the voltage and resistance for the picture below?
 

Attachments

  • Thevinin.jpg
    Thevinin.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 437
Zryn said:
Yep!



Correct!

Can you do the Thevinin transformation, finding the voltage and resistance for the picture below?

I'm not too sure honestly. For R_th you start with opening the current source, right? So that leaves the resistor by itself.

I'm not too sure where to go from there, I've never seen an example really like this before.
 
I'm not too sure honestly. For R_th you start with opening the current source, right? So that leaves the resistor by itself.

Yep. Open the current sources (and short the voltage sources) and you're left with just the resistance, so R_th = R1.

V_th is merely the voltage you would see at the terminals of that circuit. So using the terms (I and R1), how can you describe the voltage seen at those terminals?
 
Zryn said:
Yep. Open the current sources (and short the voltage sources) and you're left with just the resistance, so R_th = R1.

V_th is merely the voltage you would see at the terminals of that circuit. So using the terms (I and R1), how can you describe the voltage seen at those terminals?

By using Ohms law? V = IR1
 
By using Ohms law? V = IR1

Yep! Too easy.

So now you can replace the parallel current source and resistance with a series voltage source and resistance.

Now we have a standard negative feedback Ideal Op-Amp to analyze. Have you done these before? Looking at the picture attached, its a fairly standard set of steps:

1) Introduce the input and output side currents i1 and i2 and draw directional arrows (done). Keep in mind that we already know that the current at the inverting terminal i- = 0.

2) Do KCL at the node where i1, i2 and i- meet.

3) Write i1 and i2 in terms of voltages and resistances (using Ohms Law) instead of currents.

4) Solve the resulting equation and hopefully you get a good answer.

If you do these 4 steps (with varying levels of complication depending on how complicated the circuit is) you can pretty much solve any circuit problems of this nature. Feel free to post your workings and your results if you get stuck!
 

Attachments

  • Op Amp.jpg
    Op Amp.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 458
Zryn said:
Yep! Too easy.

So now you can replace the parallel current source and resistance with a series voltage source and resistance.

Now we have a standard negative feedback Ideal Op-Amp to analyze. Have you done these before? Looking at the picture attached, its a fairly standard set of steps:

1) Introduce the input and output side currents i1 and i2 and draw directional arrows (done). Keep in mind that we already know that the current at the inverting terminal i- = 0.

2) Do KCL at the node where i1, i2 and i- meet.

3) Write i1 and i2 in terms of voltages and resistances (using Ohms Law) instead of currents.

4) Solve the resulting equation and hopefully you get a good answer.

If you do these 4 steps (with varying levels of complication depending on how complicated the circuit is) you can pretty much solve any circuit problems of this nature. Feel free to post your workings and your results if you get stuck!

Well thanks a lot Zryn, you've really been helpful. I wish my tutors were nearly this good
 
  • #10
Well, or you can simply see that the voltage across the r1 will be zero (any nonzero voltage would give -infinity at the infinite gain amplifier's output ;) ), meaning that zero current will flow through r1, and the current I will flow through r2 , so the voltage will be -I*r2
 
  • #11
Well, or you can simply see that the voltage across the r1 will be zero (any nonzero voltage would give -infinity at the infinite gain amplifier's output ;) ), meaning that zero current will flow through r1, and the current I will flow through r2 , so the voltage will be -I*r2

Seeing the answer doesn't usually come until you have a fair level of experience with how something works (which I don't believe is the stage the OP is at), so its probably not so simple at all.

Also, how would you justify your statement mathematically to prove that you are not seeing the wrong thing (i.e. an exam answer)?
 
Back
Top