Engineering Solving Opamp Circuit Analysis: Find V0/Vs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing a non-inverting op-amp circuit to find the voltage gain, V0/Vs. The initial calculations yield V0 = 58/675*Vs, which does not match LTSpice simulation results. Participants suggest using nodal analysis for accurate results and recommend adjusting resistor values and input voltage to avoid issues with the op-amp's current limits. A discrepancy in the node equations is identified, particularly regarding the direction of current flow at the nodes. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up the equations to achieve consistent results between analytical and simulation methods.
freezer
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the voltage gain, V0/Vs, for the circuit below. All resistors are in Ohms.

opamp.png



Homework Equations


I identified this as a non inverting amplifier. Therefore:
<br /> V_{0}=\frac{R_{S}+ R_{f}}{R_{s}}V_g<br />

The Attempt at a Solution




Vo = 8/3*V1 (v1 = output of U1)
V1 = 29/900*vs

V0 = 58/675*Vs


This does not agree with LT Spice. I am not sure how to break this apart to analyze it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On your simulation, back off on the input voltage significantly: Try something like 0.01 V. That's 10 mV.
At 10V input, I think that the LT1001 is going to go into short-circuit protection mode if you try to force the pair of them to produce something on the order of 10 amps of output current.

In order to obtain the amplification analytically, try nodal analysis.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It the LTSpice simulation is using a "real" model of the op amp, your resistor values are much too small to be practical. Try increasing all the resistors by a factor of 10,000 and see if the results look more sensible.

You might need to reduce the input voltage as well. Try say 1V with the higher resistors.

If you just reduce the input to 0.01V and leave the resistors small, the LTSpice results will probably be affected by the differences between the real op amp model and an ideal op amp, so they won't agree with your hand calculations.

I think that the LT1001 is going to go into short-circuit protection mode if you try to force the pair of them to produce something on the order of 10 amps of output current.

A quick google search for the LT1001 data sheet suggests it is meant to work with currents less than 10 mA, not 10A.
 
Any tips on how to deal with that 5 ohm resister between the two?
 
freezer said:
Any tips on how to deal with that 5 ohm resister between the two?

Nodal analysis will take care of it very nicely.
 
Vs = V(R3) and V(U1) = V(R5)

For the left node
<br /> <br /> -V_{s}+ \frac{V_{U1}-V_{s}}{2}+ \frac{V_{U1}-V_{s}}{5}=0<br /> <br />

And the right node

<br /> <br /> -\frac{V_{0}}{4}+ \frac{V_{U1}}{4} + \frac{V_{U1}-V_{s}}{5}=0<br /> <br />

So for V(U1) = (17/7) Vs, which agrees with the simulation.

I have went through the second part for V0 and get V0 = 25/17 V(U1) = 25/7 Vs in both case are incorrect.
 
If I add 1 to the 25/17 then with the 17/7 for V(U1) i get a overall gain of 6 which works but not seeing where i missed it.
 
Can you explain a bit about your second node equation? Your first node equation seems to be adding the currents entering the node, while the second seems to be adding currents leaving the node. This is fine, but I'm not seeing where the first term, -Vo/4 is coming from.

Here's your circuit with the power supply lines removed (to make it a bit easier to see the relevant component connections) and what I think are your voltage designations for the relevant nodes:

attachment.php?attachmentid=67189&stc=1&d=1393815204.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 701
  • Like
Likes 1 person
That looks like the problem. Should be (V0 - V(U1) )/4 entering the node. then V(U1)/4 and (V(U1) - Vs)/5 leaving the node.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top