Operation of transistor in Opamp log amplifier

AI Thread Summary
Connecting transistor Q1 as a diode by shorting its collector to its base would introduce a base current error, affecting the accuracy of the log amplifier. This error occurs because the base current would then contribute to the collector current, leading to incorrect output readings. The circuit utilizes the exponential relationship between Vbe and Ic to generate an output Vo = -C⋅log(Vin) - Vbeo, with the second OpAmp amplifying the log output while removing Vbeo. By keeping the base and collector at ground, the design ensures that the base current does not interfere with the collector current. This careful configuration is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the log amplifier's performance.
brainbaby
Messages
232
Reaction score
5
In the figure it could also be possible to connect the transistor Q1 as a diode by shorting its collector with its base ..but instead it is done by keeping both base and collector at ground...
The text have to say that if it would be connected the other way(i.e by shorting collector and base )then the base current would have caused an error ( Base current error ) .
Which type of error is the author talking about..?
Why and how does the error manifest itself...?

Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Opamp log amplifier.png
    Opamp log amplifier.png
    6.5 KB · Views: 574
Engineering news on Phys.org
The circuit around the first OpAmp uses the exponential relationship between Vbe and Ic in the feedback to create an output Vo = -C⋅log(Vin) - Vbeo. The circuit around the second OpAmp removes Vbeo and amplifies the log output.

If you look at Q1, you see that Ib goes from ground (constant potential) into the OpAmp output (very low output resistance) and therefore is not part of the collector current. If collector and base were shorted, the base current and the collector current would be added.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top