Optics: Electric fields, beams, irradiance

blorpinbloo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electromagnetic wave in a vacuum /w magnetic field of 265 mG.

If the wave is spatially confined to a beam with a diameter of .75mm, how much energy is measured by a photodetector with an active area with diameter 5 cm in one second.


The Attempt at a Solution



This is one part of the question, but its the only one that has me stuck. I found the max electric field to be 7950 N/c, and the irradiance I found to be 83941.14 W/m^2. I know that irradiance is power/area, so to get the beam power, I'd take 83941.14*(pi*(.00075/2)^2). Then power is energy per unit time, so I'd just divide by one second to get the beam energy. The confusion comes when the photodetector comes into play. I'm not sure how the active area of the photodetector affects the energy that it reads. This is where I'm stumped. Any help is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the detector is larger than the beam, it receives the full energy of the beam.

If the detector were smaller than the beam, you would have to figure out what fraction of the beam energy actually hits the detector. (But for this problem you do not need to do this.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top