Optimal Vertical Mirror Height for a 5'0'' Person: Calculating the Perfect Fit

AI Thread Summary
To determine the optimal height for a vertical mirror for a 5'0" person, it's essential to consider their eye level, which is approximately 5 feet from the ground. Assuming the person stands about 2 feet away from the mirror, the bottom of the mirror should be positioned at least 5 feet high for a full image view. Utilizing the concept of similar triangles helps establish a proportion to calculate the necessary height of the mirror. However, the calculations presented lead to an unrealistic negative height, indicating a flaw in the approach. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the need for accurate measurements and understanding of geometry to find the correct mirror height.
nemzy
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
determine the minimum height of a vertical flat mirror in which a person 5'0'' in height can see his or her full image.


I have absolutely no idea how to solve this type of problem...

Since we don't know the distance between the object and the mirror, how in the world can we calculate the minimum height of a vertical flat mirror?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem's giving you all the data you need.Try to think of how light rays come from infinity...

Daniel.
 


First, we need to understand the concept of eye level. Eye level is the height at which a person's eyes are located when standing upright. For a person who is 5'0'' in height, their eye level would be approximately 5 feet from the ground. This is important to keep in mind when determining the optimal height for a vertical mirror.

Next, we need to consider the distance between the person and the mirror. Let's assume that the person is standing approximately 2 feet away from the mirror. This would mean that the bottom of the mirror should be at least 5 feet from the ground, in order for the person to see their full image.

However, this is just a general estimate and may not be the most accurate solution. To get a more precise calculation, we can use the concept of similar triangles. This means that the ratio of the height of the person to the distance between the person and the mirror should be equal to the ratio of the height of the full image to the distance between the bottom of the mirror and the ground.

Using this concept, we can set up a proportion and solve for the height of the mirror. Let's say the person's height is represented by 'x' and the distance between the person and the mirror is represented by 'y'. The height of the full image can be represented by 'z' and the distance between the bottom of the mirror and the ground can be represented by 'w'.

Therefore, our proportion would be: x/y = z/w

Substituting the values we know, we get: 5 feet / 2 feet = z / (z + 5 feet)

Solving for z, we get: z = (5 feet / 2 feet) * (z + 5 feet)

z = 2.5z + 12.5 feet

0.5z = 12.5 feet

z = 25 feet

This means that the height of the full image in the mirror is 25 feet. Now, to calculate the minimum height of the vertical mirror, we need to subtract this value from the person's height and the distance between the person and the mirror. So, the minimum height of the vertical mirror would be 5 feet - 25 feet = -20 feet. This doesn't make sense, as a mirror cannot have a negative height.

Therefore, we can conclude that the optimal height of the vertical flat mirror for a person who is
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top