Oscillating electron has drift velocity too?

AI Thread Summary
An electron in an oscillating electric field exhibits both oscillatory motion and drift velocity due to the nature of the applied force. When subjected to a sinusoidal electric field, the electron accelerates and results in a drift velocity component alongside its oscillation. The discussion highlights that if the electric field were instead cosine-based, the resulting velocity would differ, raising questions about the physical implications of these variations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying boundary conditions and understanding the dynamics of oscillatory systems, suggesting that the electron's initial state and the nature of the electric field significantly affect its motion. Ultimately, the complexities of electron behavior in oscillating fields underline the need for a deeper understanding of differential equations in physics.
loonychune
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Just hoping you might explain the physics here for me.

An electron is placed in an oscillating electric field, say,

E = E_0\sin(\omega t)

and as a result accelerates in x at,

a = a_0\sin(\omega t)

(grouped some constants in a_0). Solving for the resulting motion yields,

x = \frac{a_0}{\omega}t - \frac{a_0}{{\omega}^2}\sin(\omega t)

In the second term we see the expected oscillatory motion. However, in the first term we have something corresponding to uniform velocity! The electron drifts as well as oscillates!

Why?



Thanks

Damian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should probably be a little clearer as to the velocity of the electron:

v(t) = \frac{a_0}{\omega} -\frac{a_0}{\omega}\cos\omega t

EDIT: Something to ponder:

If the electric field we apply is:

E = E_0\cos\omega t

then the resulting velocity is:

v(t) = -\frac{a_0}{\omega}\cos\omega t

Is this physically possible and why, physically, the difference?
 
Last edited:
I suspect there are errors in the ways you are applying boundary values / initial conditions if you're looking for simple oscillation. If you try to simultaneously impose conditions of v=0 at x=0 at t=0, that doesn't fit the general oscillating case (where speed is greatest at zero displacement and force is greatest at the place of maximum displacement). Just let
v (t=0) = - \frac{q E_0}{m \omega}

Part of the problem is that you never really "drop an electron in, or conversely "start" or "stop" that incoming planer E-field -- its supposedly uniform in time and space and the electron is in steady state. Check out this simulation of an electron on a wire: http://phet.colorado.edu/simulations/sims.php?sim=Radio_Waves_and_Electromagnetic_Fields" In the simulation, you do get some initial slosh in an antenna if you suddenly start or stop the oscillation, and the response of the slosh is determined by the resistance of the wire and the capacitance of the system (since the wire is essentially a capacitor with a positive plate and one end and a negative plate at the other end)... eventually with the resistance dissipating the energy, and the capacitance pushing the charge back to an even distribution if you stop the signal and let the wire "discharge."

Also think about adding a mass to a vertical spring... the oscillation isn't about the unstretched length of the spring... there's offset because of the mass. Often I like to think of electrical systems as gravity systems (just with charge relating to mass).

By the way, typically you try to solve the differential equation ( -- not integrating step-by-step imposing boundary conditions... which might be wrong, as in this case). In this case the problem is a second order HOMOGENEOUS ordinary differential equation (i.e. there is no constant in the force... what you would expect if there were a constant offset to the field, which would cause uniform acceleration. This site has some info about diffeq's: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/OrdinaryDifferentialEquation.html" and you can link to solving second order homogeneous diffeq's). You really should have a textbook on the matter, and preferably take a course as well. The generic version to this would have sine and cosine forms... that you'd then fit with best boundary conditions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply.

I'm still none the wiser however.

If you would, pick out the stages in the following and explain where we couldn't in fact do that.

An electron with mass m is initially at rest in the ionosphere. It is suddenly subjected to an electric field,

E = E_0\sin\omega t

See, can you not do this? You have an electron that's at rest and you apply some field that goes as sin(wt).

Thus, it accelerates as,

a = \frac{-eE_0}{m}\sin\omega t

Then,

v(t) = \int^{t}_{0}a_0\sin\omega t

Therefore,

v(t) = \frac{a_0}{\omega} - \frac{a_0}{\omega}\cos\omega t
 
I don't mean to be an arse and force the issue, but I have the idea that, since the particle IS at rest at x = 0 and should in fact be at a maximum here but isn't until the sine function 'catches up' then some of the kinetic energy goes into just moving the electron and not oscillating (which it would if E = E_0coswt)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top