Partial differential derivation

Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Hi guys, I am having a problem, knowing where to start with this question. Before I spend trying derive the partial derivative chain rule from first principles I would just like to know if this is what this questions is asking. If it is not asking that, how do I go about solving it.
upload_2017-3-3_2-20-29.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have not shown solution beacuse I am unware where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have mange to come up with one solution, which: If I think that y,x are all functions of t. Then I could say: dx=dx/dt *dt and dy=dy/dt *dt sub into the total differential and get ##\partial{df}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}*dt+\partial{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}*dt## I am just unsure of this method, I feel like I am cheating, any advice?
 
Taylor_1989 said:
I have mange to come up with one solution, which: If I think that y,x are all functions of t. Then I could say: dx=dx/dt *dt and dy=dy/dt *dt sub into the total differential and get ##\partial{df}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}*dt+\partial{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}*dt## I am just unsure of this method, I feel like I am cheating, any advice?
This -- ##\partial{df}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}*dt+\partial{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{dt}*dt## -- doesn't make any sense. The expression ##df## is defined (it's the differential of f), but this one ##\partial f## doesn't mean anything.

You have f(x, y) where x is a function of t and y is another function of t. This means that f is ultimately a function of t, albeit one with two parameters.
 
Sorry for the bad latex, I did eventually solve the problem. I was over thinking the problem and thought I had to derive partial chain rule from first principles, which I on my way to doing, by deriving the non partial chain rule. As a question, am I on the right lines if I derive chain rule from first principles then, then apply the same method to partial, would I be able to derive the above formula?
 
Taylor_1989 said:
Sorry for the bad latex, I did eventually solve the problem. I was over thinking the problem and thought I had to derive partial chain rule from first principles, which I on my way to doing, by deriving the non partial chain rule. As a question, am I on the right lines if I derive chain rule from first principles then, then apply the same method to partial, would I be able to derive the above formula?
Which formula above do you mean?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top