Pendulum with spring instead of rod

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the complexities of modeling a pendulum that uses a spring instead of a solid rod. Unlike a simple pendulum with one degree of freedom (the angle), this setup introduces two degrees of freedom: the angle and the spring's extension. Traditional methods like Euler's or Runge Kutta are mentioned as suitable for simpler models, but the spring complicates the equations of motion. Lagrangian mechanics is suggested as a standard approach to derive the necessary equations for this non-harmonic oscillation. The conversation emphasizes the need for a dedicated thread to maintain forum organization.
nneutrino
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
When we have solid rod instead of spring I can solve this problem in Microsoft Excel either with Euler´s method or Runge Kutta method, but that spring makes this problem hard for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That problem is a lot more complicated. Basically, instead of the one degree of freedom that you had for the simple pendulum (the angle), you have two (the angle, and the extension of the spring). The standard way to solve such a problem is to obtain the equations (note that I said it in plural) of motion with, say, Lagrangian mechanics. To keep this thread dedicated to its original title (Non-harmonic oscillation of pendulum) it would probably be better if you created a new thread with this question to keep the forum neatly organized. :oldbiggrin:
 
Hi,
Can you help me to find out appropriate numerical model of calculating position depending on time of special pendulum. It is basically gravity pendulum but we have a spring instead of rod. (picture)
300px-Simple_gravity_pendulum.svg.png
 
Thread closed for Moderation...

Edit (fresh_42): Post #3 is actually the opening post, which has been separated from another thread.
Thread re-opened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K