Percent Uncertainty Shenanigans

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving percent uncertainty calculations, specifically comparing Parts C and D, which differ only by the inclusion of the sine function. The original poster successfully applied a method from their textbook but encountered discrepancies in the expected answer for Part D, leading to confusion about the correct approach. A responder clarified that the sine function is non-linear, affecting the percent uncertainty and requiring different methods for accurate calculations. Suggestions included using calculus for uncertainty propagation or estimating errors by calculating results at the extremes of the uncertainty range. The original poster expressed gratitude for the insights but noted their limited background in calculus and trigonometry.
dumakey1212
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Parts C and D: http://s7.postimg.org/pnq5gry63/image.png

Part D of this problem is just like Part C above it. The only difference is the presence of "sin," but that doesn't affect the calculation of percent uncertainty at all. Chapter 1 of my Physics book (Physics: Principles with Applications - Giancoli) says you calculate it by dividing the 0.5 by 71 and multiplying by 100. I used this exact approach for Parts A, B, and C and got the right answers but magically it doesn't seem to work for this last part even though it is the exact same as Parts A, B, and C. Almost seems to be a glitch in the system. The answer should be 0.7, but this doesn't work. I really don't understand what is going on. Thanks for any help with this, guys!

Edit: I just randomly punched in values since my awesome professor gives us like 30 attempts for each problem, and wound up discovering the claimed correct answer is 0.3. This makes absolutely no sense and does not equate with the method used to do this problem. I have no idea how one would arrive at 0.3 as the answer. So confused, probably Mastering Physics shenanigans, already reported to professor.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dumakey1212 said:
Parts C and D: http://s7.postimg.org/pnq5gry63/image.png

Part D of this problem is just like Part C above it. The only difference is the presence of "sin," but that doesn't affect the calculation of percent uncertainty at all. Chapter 1 of my Physics book (Physics: Principles with Applications - Giancoli) says you calculate it by dividing the 0.5 by 71 and multiplying by 100. I used this exact approach for Parts A, B, and C and got the right answers but magically it doesn't seem to work for this last part even though it is the exact same as Parts A, B, and C. Almost seems to be a glitch in the system. The answer should be 0.7, but this doesn't work. I really don't understand what is going on. Thanks for any help with this, guys!

Edit: I just randomly punched in values since my awesome professor gives us like 30 attempts for each problem, and wound up discovering the claimed correct answer is 0.3. This makes absolutely no sense and does not equate with the method used to do this problem. I have no idea how one would arrive at 0.3 as the answer. So confused, probably Mastering Physics shenanigans, already reported to professor.

Hi dumakey1212. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Be sure to familiarize yourself with the posting guidelines associated with the homework help sections; you should have used the posting template provided when you started the new thread.

The sin function does make a difference! It's a non-linear function so its output is not necessarily proportional to the input. That means the result can yield different percentages of error depending upon where along the sine curve the angle lies.

What methods have you been taught to deal with uncertainty propagation when such functions are involved?
 
We haven't been taught how to do anything with trigonometric things yet but are rather expected to from previous coursework. I guess I don't understand what you would do with trigonometry in calculating this or how sine factors into this since you're given the value and the uncertainty estimate, which is all I've been taught you need.
 
dumakey1212 said:
We haven't been taught how to do anything with trigonometric things yet but are rather expected to from previous coursework. I guess I don't understand what you would do with trigonometry in calculating this or how sine factors into this since you're given the value and the uncertainty estimate, which is all I've been taught you need.

Have you learned any calculus yet? There is a general method for calculating uncertainties which involves using differentiation. Look up Uncertainties and Error Propagation on the net. In particular, have a gander at http://www.rit.edu/~w-uphysi/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart2.html, and at part (f) Other Functions: Getting formulas using partial derivatives, in particular.

Without using calculus you might estimate the error by directly calculating the results at the extremes of the uncertainty spread (sin(θ - Δθ) and sin(θ + Δθ)) to estimate the total spread of the result around the "actual" value, sin(θ).
 
Yeah, that's all a bit over my head. I had pre-calc/trig 5 years ago and AP Calculus 3 years ago. Thank you for explaining it, though, you are very knowledgeable on this subject!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top