PhD in Semiconductor Nano Devices after undergrad in Computer Engineer

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a PhD in semiconductor devices with a computer science background presents challenges, particularly due to a lack of solid state physics knowledge. The professor acknowledges that hard work is essential but reassures that many students successfully transition between fields. Initial struggles with understanding complex terminology and equations in "Semiconductor Device Fundamentals" by Robert F. Pierret are common. To bridge the knowledge gap, it is advisable to review foundational physics concepts, specifically introductory courses like PH101 and PH102. Seeking additional resources or textbooks to solidify basic physics understanding before diving deeper into semiconductor studies is recommended. Engaging with the professor for tailored guidance is also crucial for navigating this academic transition.
hasniali
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am getting an opportunity to do PhD in semiconductor devices. The professor is quite active in the field and publishing good research. I have no background in solid state physics. How difficult it could be with a computer science background? Also where should I start once enrolled in a graduate program; study material etc? Thanking you in anticipation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be asking the professor these questions; he will be much more tuned into this specific program.
 
Prof says that it will require hardwork but you can do it because a lot of people change their fields during grad studies. I have been reading Semiconductor Device Fundamentals by Robert F. Pierret as recommended by prof but I can not understand a lot of stuff. I get lost in so many terminologies and equations that I am unable to grasp the basic concept or particular phenomena.
 
hasniali said:
Prof says that it will require hardwork but you can do it because a lot of people change their fields during grad studies. I have been reading Semiconductor Device Fundamentals by Robert F. Pierret as recommended by prof but I can not understand a lot of stuff. I get lost in so many terminologies and equations that I am unable to grasp the basic concept or particular phenomena.

I think you just answered the first question from your OP.

Your CS background taught you how to use these devices in a computational setting without going into the details of how they worked. Now, you're deep in the belly of the beast, for which your previous experience has left you unprepared. You might have to brush up on some more basic physics before tackling the solid state and semiconductor stuff.
 
SteamKing said:
I think you just answered the first question from your OP.

Your CS background taught you how to use these devices in a computational setting without going into the details of how they worked. Now, you're deep in the belly of the beast, for which your previous experience has left you unprepared. You might have to brush up on some more basic physics before tackling the solid state and semiconductor stuff.
By basic you mean general physics courses like PH101 & PH102? Kindly recommend a textbook or any other resource to start with and then finally deal with the Rebert F. Pierret book on Fundamentals of Semiconductor Devices.
Best Regards,
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
112
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top