Photoelectric Effect: Calculating Potential Difference

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the potential difference needed to stop the fastest photoelectrons emitted from a nickel surface under ultraviolet light of 220 nm wavelength, the work function of nickel (5.00 eV) must be converted to Joules. The equation h[c]/λ = Φ + eV is used, where h is Planck's constant and c is the speed of light. The initial calculations provided an incorrect result in m/s instead of volts, indicating a misunderstanding of unit conversion. It is crucial to maintain proper units throughout the calculations to arrive at the correct potential difference in volts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit consistency and conversion in physics problems.
Sassenav22
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What potential difference must be applied to stop the fastest photoelectrons by a nickel surface under the action of ultraviolet light of wavelength 220 nm? work function of nickel is 5.00eV.

Homework Equations


h[c]/[\lambda] = \Phi + eV

The Attempt at a Solution


h=6.6x10^-34 Js
c=3.0x10^8 m/s
\lambda=200x10^-9 m
\Phi=5.00eV
e=1.6x10^-19
V=?

[6.6x10^-34(3.0x10^8)]/[/200x10^-9] = 5.00 + 1.6x10^-19V
9.9x10^-37 = 5.00 + 1.6x10^-19V
9.9x10^37/5.00 = + 1.6x10^-19V
1.98x10^37 / - 1.6x10^-19 =V
v= 1.23x10^.18m/s

not sure if this is right
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to convert the work function from eV to Joules before you plug it in.
 
Also: really watch your units. As you have the equation solved... you're giving an answer in m/s... which doesn't make any sense. Carry your units along with the math... the problem is looking for a potential difference (and the solution should therefore be in volts).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top