Photons and the Photoelectric Effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of light that causes photoemission in metallic sodium with a work function of 2.3 eV. Participants clarify that the maximum kinetic energy (KE) of the emitted photoelectrons can be calculated using the formula KE = 0.5 * mv^2, where v is the speed of the electrons. After converting the work function to joules and adding it to the kinetic energy, they apply the equation E = hc/λ to find the correct wavelength. One participant initially miscalculated the wavelength but corrected it after realizing the proper method to find KE. Ultimately, the correct wavelength determined from the calculations is approximately 1.82e-7 m.
frankene
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Light is incident on the surface of metallic sodium, whose work function is 2.3 eV. The maximum speed of the photoelectrons emitted by the surface is 1.26e6 m/s. What is the wavelength of the light?

I first converted Work Function to Joules:

2.3eV x (1.6e-19 J / 1eV) = 3.68e-19 J

The equation I know is:

hf = KEmax + Work Function

hf can also be written as:

hc/lamda

I thought I would substitute c w/ the 1.26e6 m/s and use KEmax as zero. My answer was 2.27e-9m and that is not correct.

I used the following:

f = Work Function / h = 5.55e14 Hz

Then I used:

lamda = v/f = 2.27e-9 m

If I can't substitute v for c, then what am I looking for with v? I have looked at this problem for 3 days w/ no new ideas. Anyone else have any?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you worked out the ke of the electrons?

When I do this I get the E for the light different to the value you give.

And I don't understand what you're doing with this
lamda = v/f = 2.27e-9 m

Find the Ke of the electron (joules) Convert WF to joules and add. This is the energy of the light.

Then use E = hc/lamda

I get 636 nm
 
Thank you.

I didn't realize I could find KE by using .5 *mv^2 and use the mass of an electron. Once I did that I added WF and then divied hc by my answer. The answer I got was 1.82e-7 m and that was correct.

Thank you again for the help. I knew I was thinkging too hard and not looking at the obvious.
 
good - don't know why my answer's wrong...one too many glases of wine before using a calculator?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top