How Does Introducing Different Dielectrics Affect Capacitance?

AI Thread Summary
Introducing different dielectrics in a parallel plate capacitor affects capacitance by altering the electric field and potential differences across the plates. The capacitance with air is C1, while the introduction of dielectrics with relative permittivities ε1=2 and ε2=4 changes it to C2. The discussion reveals confusion about whether certain dielectric arrangements can be treated in series or parallel, emphasizing that the electric fields are not uniform across different sections. It is clarified that the electric field between the dielectrics varies, preventing a simple parallel-series combination. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately calculating the new capacitance.
vijayramakrishnan
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel plate capacitor having plates of area S and plate separation d, has capacitance C1 in air. When two dielectrics of different relative permittivities ( ε1=2 and ε2=4) are introduced between the two plates as shown in the figure, the capacitance becomes C2. the ratio C2/C1 is

Homework Equations


C= ε0A/d[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


if we name the components 1,2,3,4 in clockwise manner,in the solution 1 and 2 are taken in series and 3 and 4 are taken in series and they both are connected parallel,can we also take 1 and 4 in parallel and 2 and 3 in parallel and they both are connected in series?in that case answer comes out to be 12/5 where have i gone wrong?
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0473.JPG
    DSC_0473.JPG
    14.8 KB · Views: 451
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vijayramakrishnan said:
can we also take 1 and 4 in parallel and 2 and 3 in parallel and they both are connected in series?
No. Electric field between 1 and 2 (left half) is not same as the electric field between 3 and 4(left half).
 
cnh1995 said:
No. Electric field between 1 and 2 (left half) is not same as the electric field between 3 and 4(left half).
sir 2 is not left half,1234 in clockwise direction
 
vijayramakrishnan said:
sir 2 is not left half,1234 in clockwise direction
sir,do you mean to say that the potential difference between positive terminal and interface between 1 and 2 is not same as potential difference between positive terminal and interface between 3 and 4.
 
cnh1995 said:
No. Electric field between 1 and 2 (left half) is not same as the electric field between 3 and 4(left half).
sir,do you mean to say that the potential difference between positive terminal and interface between 1 and 2 is not same as potential difference between positive terminal and interface between 3 and 4.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top