PM Synchronous motor Id-Iq current control

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges in implementing Id-Iq current control for a four-pole PM synchronous motor, particularly in getting the Iq current to follow a set reference. The user previously succeeded with a cascaded speed control for a DC motor by adjusting PI controller gains but is struggling to achieve similar results with the PM motor. They note that varying the integral gain affects motor rotation and speed but does not yield the desired Iq response. A suggestion is made to ensure the system can produce a current vector in the stator-fixed reference frame before addressing the rotor-fixed reference frame. The conversation emphasizes the importance of validating the foundational components of the control system before progressing.
awaiting
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am trying to implement the current control (Id, Iq) of a four pole PM synchronous motor. I am having trouble in making the Iq current follow a set reference.

115622d1426715693t-pi.jpg


I had also implemented a cascaded speed control for a dc motor.

115621d1426715561t-cascaded.jpg


In that case, I adjusted the gains of the PI controller (inner loop/current loop) by stalling the motor and checked if the motor current followed the set reference current. It worked in this way for the dc motor. I thought of doing the same way for Iq but I am not getting the expected results.

In delta configuration of the stator, if I make the integral gain to be zero, the motor does not rotate. The motor starts rotating if I increase the integral gain to 1 and the speed increases as I increase the integral gain and reaches the maximum value depending upon the supply voltage.
If I stall the motor at different speeds, I get different values of Iq, say for 30 rad/s I have a current of 30mA and 60 rad/s, it is 50mA.
The motor current (Iq) is not following the reference current for any change I am making in the Kp and Ki values

Is there any other approach to achieve the PI control for both the currents?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your images can only be viewed with an edaboard account.
 
Sorry about that!
Should have checked the links after posting them..anyways they are below..

Fig 1

upload_2015-3-22_13-27-36.jpeg


Fig 2

upload_2015-3-22_13-28-0.jpeg
 
Have you checked that the basics of your system work, e.g. making sure you can produce a current vector in the stator-fixed reference frame (αβ-components) that follows some reference? If that works, then you can start worrying about the rotor-fixed reference frame.

In general, if you represent your system as a hierarchy of components, you start at the root, test it through and through, and then you can start building atop of it. In your case, the root could be a sampling system, with the reference-frame transformations built atop of it.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top