Point on wheel with constant velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motion of a point on a bicycle wheel moving at a constant speed across a plane. While the bicycle's axle maintains a constant velocity, the velocity of a point on the wheel varies depending on its position, demonstrating that its absolute speed relative to the plane is not constant. It is proposed that achieving a constant absolute velocity for the point relative to the plane is theoretically possible if the point is within the wheel's radius, but not if it is on the axle. The mathematical relationship governing this motion involves oscillation and the path of the point is described as a curtate cycloid. The conversation highlights the complexities of velocity and acceleration in circular motion, emphasizing the need for precise definitions in physics.
birulami
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
Let a bicycle run straight on a plane past you from left to right with constant speed. As a representative point of the bicycle take the center of the back axle. Since the bicycle has constant speed with regard to the plane, so has the axle (trivial). In addition a point on the rim of the wheel, say R, has constant angular velocity. Even more, with regard to the axle center, the absolute value of the velocity of R, i.e. |v_R| is constant.

But, with regard to the plane, the velocity of R is not constant. As an example let's look at the horizontal speed of R between the angles 12 o'clock (top) and 3 o'clock (right). R moves 2\pi r/4+r if the radius of the wheel is r. Why? At the start, R is on top of the axle, at the end, the axle moved a quarter circumference and R is a distance of r in front of it. With a similar argument we find that between angles from 3 to 6 o'clock, R only moves 2\pi r/4-r. Since the time for both moves is the same, the horizontal speed with regard to the plane is obviously different. In both cases the vertical distance traveled by R is r. Consequently the absolute value of the velocity vector of R with regard to the plane is not constant.

Now the questions:
  1. Is it possible to let the bicycle move such that the absolute value of the velocity of R with regard to the plane is constant? How does the mathematical function look like and how does the bicycle move then?
  2. Can we have constant speed of the bicycle as well as a constant absolute value of the velocity of R at the same time, if necessary drop the requirement of circular motion of R?

Every hint appreciated,
Harald.​

(No, not a homework assignment :frown:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, all you have to do is lock the wheels and make the bicycle slide along the ground...
 
I think that the answer is no.
Lets look at the horizontal component of the speed. You can pretend that the point is connected to a spring and it is ossilating back and forth horizontaly to the ground, the other end of the spring is connected to the axle.
Now if what you say is possible then simply adding a constant velocity to the ossilating point would make the speed of the point always be 0. But that means that the speed of the point is constant which is false.
 
I wish I could find the picture online, it was on in my physics textbook. It was a shot of a bicycle wheel in motion. The top is very blurred and the bottom is very crisp. This is because a point at the top of the wheel is spinning much faster than one at the bottom (relative to the ground).
 
Is it possible to let the bicycle move such that the absolute value of the velocity of R with regard to the plane is constant?
Yes, as long as the point is inside the radius of the wheel. See below.
How does the mathematical function look like and how does the bicycle move then?
It speeds up and slow down relative to 1 / (R + r cos(angle)), where 0 angle means vertical, and increasing clockwise.
Can we have constant speed of the bicycle as well as a constant absolute value of the velocity of R at the same time
No, unless the point is on the axle (distance from axle to point is zero).

The shape of the path of the point relative to the ground is a curtate cycloid. If the bicycle was upside down and rolling on the roof, and the point was on the perimeter, the path would be a brachistrone. (Do a web search for graphs and more info).

Someone here check my math, just to be sure.

\mbox{let}\ R = \mbox{radius of wheel}

\mbox{let}\ r = \mbox{radius to point on wheel}

\mbox{let}\ \theta = \mbox{angle to point, with 0 meaning vertical and increasing clockwise, like a hand on a clock.}

x = R\ \theta\ +\ r\ sin(\theta)

y = R\ +\ r\ cos(\theta)

\mbox{let}\ \omega = \mbox{angular velocity}= (d \theta \ /\ dt) = \dot \theta

Velocity of point

\dot x = R\ \omega \ +\ r\ \omega \ cos(\omega\ t\ ) = \omega \ (\ R\ +\ r\ cos(\omega \ t)\ ) = \omega \ (\ R\ +\ r\ cos(\theta)\ )

\dot y = -r\ sin(\omega \ t) = -r\ sin(\theta)

Let V = constant velocity of point.

\omega = V\ /\ (\ R\ +\ r\ cos(\omega \ t)\ ) = V\ /\ (\ R\ +\ r\ cos(\theta)\ )
 
Last edited:
Math aside (since I don't know any) the thing that bothers me about the original question is probably just a matter of semantics. As far as I know, there is no such thing as a 'constant angular velocity'. Velocity is a vector involving both speed and direction. On a wheel, that direction is constantly changing, which means that the point in question on the wheel is undergoing constant acceleration.
Mind you, I've had an awful lot of beer tonight, so I might have missed something. :redface:
 
Oh, stupid me, I was only thinking of constant velocity.
 
Back
Top