1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Polaroid (conceptual doubt)

  1. Dec 31, 2017 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    It is just a conceptual doubt

    2. Relevant equations
    According to malus law intensity of light through polaroid is
    I=(Io)cos^2(theta) where theta is the angle between axis of polaroid and incident light.

    3. The attempt at a solution
    But when Theta=0 then I=Io but in my book it is I=Io/2.

    and also is my diagram below correct?

    --->(light)(I) [](polaroid) --->(I/2) [] --->(I/4) (theta=0 degrees for both polaroid)
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 31, 2017 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    ##I_o## is generally taken to be the intensity of the light after an unpolarized source has passed through one polarizer (hence polarizing it). Half of intensity of the source is lost by the first polarization.

    Take a look at the diagram for the Law of Malus entry on the Hyperphysics web site:

  4. Jan 4, 2018 #3
    Thankyou :)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Polaroid (conceptual doubt)