Polish Physics Olympiad: Proving Adiabatic Reversible Process

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem from the 56th Polish Olympiad in Physics regarding an adiabatic reversible process involving a tube with pistons of different diameters. The participant analyzes the forces acting on the pistons and the tube, deriving equations based on pressure differences and accelerations. The attempt to prove the relationship between the accelerations and pressures is presented, culminating in the conclusion that the net force on the tube is due to the pressure difference acting over its cross-sectional area. The participant expresses confidence in the correctness of their derivation, which aligns with the principles of momentum conservation and pressure dynamics in fluid mechanics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the mechanics of adiabatic processes in physics.
marcnn
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(56th Polish Olympiad in Physics, 2007) We have a tube of mass ##M##, consisting of two segments of diameters ##d_1, d_2##. The pistons (see the picture http://www.kgof.edu.pl/archiwum/56/of56-2-1-R.pdf) have mass ##m_1, m_2##.

At the start the air inside had pressure ##p_0## equaling the pressure outside the pipe. The tube itself and the right piston weren't moving. The left piston was moving to the right with velocity ##v_p##.
The force air acts on an element of a piston or a pipe doesn't depend on the element's velocity.

The process is adiabatic and reversible and the pistons are hermetic. We neglect the friction.

Homework Equations



It is suggested that if ##a_1, a_2, a_3## are the accelerations of the left piston, right piston and the tube respectively, ##S_i = \frac {\pi d_i^2}4, i = 1,2##, moreover ##\Delta S = S_1 - S_2## and ##p## is the difference of pressures, then
$$m_1 a_1 = -pS_1 ~~~~(1)$$
$$m_2 a_2 = pS_2 ~~~~(2)$$
$$M a_3 = p \Delta S ~~~~(3)$$

Is my attempt of proving this correct?

The Attempt at a Solution



The formulas (1) and (2) are obvious and come from the formula ##F = pS##. It's only left to prove the formula (3).
Let ##p_1## be the momentum of the left piston, ##p_2## - of the right piston and the tube. The momentum of the whole system is constant, so ##p_1 +p_2 = 0##. Hence the difference ##d(P_1 + P_2) = dp_1 + dp_2 = 0##. If it happens over the same, very short time, we have
$$ 0 = \frac {dp_1}{dt} + \frac {dp_2}{dt} = \frac {m_1 dv_1}{dt} + \frac {m_2 dv_2 + M dv_3}{dt} = m_1 a_1 + m_2 a_2 + M a_3 $$

Hence
$$Ma_3 = -m_1a_1 - m_2 a_2 = p(S_1 - S_2) = p \Delta S$$

Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that's correct. Note that it agrees with the notion that the net force on ##M## is due to the difference in pressure ##p## acting over the regions of ##M## shown below.
 

Attachments

  • Pistons.png
    Pistons.png
    995 bytes · Views: 457
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top