Position-time graphs and tangent lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the importance of tangent lines in position-time graphs, particularly in calculating instantaneous velocity. While the slope formula can provide average velocity between two points, tangent lines give the slope at a specific moment, which is crucial for accurate velocity measurements. The user notes that their calculated slopes are close to textbook values, but acknowledges potential errors due to graphing inaccuracies. It is clarified that using points to find slopes yields average velocities, while tangent lines yield instantaneous velocities at defined times. A resource is shared that effectively explains the concept of tangents in this context.
supernova1203
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
The Following data table provides information about a crate of radishes that is sliding down the ramp of a delivery truck

time position
0 ------ 0
2------ 0.6
4-------2.4
6------- 5.4
8------- 9.6
10------ 15Next it asks you to draw a position time graph, which i did, and its identical to the one in the curriculum. Then it asks you to draw 3 tangent lines, one at 4s, one at 6s, and one at 8s

Then it asks you to calculate the slopes of the tangents and put it in a time velocity table, which i have also done.

My question is why do we need a tangent line to find the slope? Cant we just use the simple slope formula to find the slope? v = d2-d2/t2-t2
Whats the point of a tangent slope? I don't get it.

Also this may seem trivial but can i use any 2 points on the line to find the slope? In this instance i used the given points along the line, for each tangent(4 seconds, 6 seconds, 8 seconds) i used the point, and the point before it to find the slope, i got the answers, and they were very close to the solution that the book has, and the book states that if the solutions are close then its good enough because some of the errors might be due to graphing and drawing of the tangent, even though i didnt use the graphical method to determine slope, i just use the formula. Because of this I am thinking , oh since i used the slope formula, i shouldn't be off at all, but in my solution I am off by like 0.2, all the answers however are very close, i got 0.9 m/s for 4 s, 1.5 m/s for 6s and 2.1 m/s for 8s.
Are these right? Sorry if it looks like i just put all my unorganized thoughts up here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your calcs with the points should be close. When you use the points at 4 and 6 seconds, the slope you find will be equal to the slope of the curve itself at some time between 4 and 6. You don't know what that time is exactly, so you won't have a definite time to put in your velocity/time table. You could guess 5 seconds, but you don't really know.

If you draw a smooth curve through the x,t points and a tangent line accurately (and that is an art as well as a skill), you are getting the slope at a known time - where the line touches the curve.

I have a pretty experienced eye, and I think your slope at time 4 is a little too low.
graph2.jpg
 
Last edited:
#edit, someone said that v=d2-d1/t2-t1 is not for slope but for avg velocity, but since in this game we are dealing with position time graph, the velocity is the slope, am i right?
 
Your slope of the secant line through two points is an average velocity over the interval t1 to t2. The instantaneous velocity at time t is the slope of the tangent line that touches the curve at t.
 
hm.. i found this really awsome website, and it makes sense now

http://www.holmdel.k12.nj.us/faculty/pkeller/Summer%20Part%20I.htm

just wanted to share.

at the 2nd half of the page, it does a really good job of explaining this tangent business
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top