Potential Difference between Two Points affected by a Dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the potential difference between two points in the electric field created by a dipole aligned along the y-axis. The initial approach incorrectly attempted to estimate the potential difference without integrating the electric field, leading to confusion. The correct method involves setting up the integral of the electric field along the specified path, simplifying it to an easier form. After performing the integration, the final result for the potential difference was confirmed as -4.8e+2 V. The participants acknowledged the importance of proper integration in solving the problem effectively.
Oribe Yasuna
Messages
43
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A dipole is centered at the origin, with its axis along the y axis, so that at locations on the y axis, the electric field due to the dipole is given by
E vector =
leftangle1.gif
0, 1/4πε0 * 2qs/y^3, 0
rightangle1.gif
V/m
The charges making up the dipole are q1 = +6 nC and q2 = -6 nC and the dipole separation is s = 4 mm (see figure below). What is the potential difference along a path starting at location P1 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.02, 0
rightangle0.gif
m and ending at location P2 =
leftangle0.gif
0, 0.06, 0
rightangle0.gif
m?

709adee12d.png


Homework Equations


delta V = - integral of i -> f (E vector * delta L vector)

The Attempt at a Solution


delta V = 2qs/4πε0 ( 1/P2^3 - 1/P1^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = 9e+9 * 2(6e-9)(0.004) * ( 1/(0.06)^3 - 1/(0.02)^3 ) * 0.04
delta V = -2.08e+3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your relevant equations you indicated that finding the potential difference involves integrating the electric field along the path between the points of interest. I don't see you doing that in your solution attempt. It would appear that you're just taking the difference in the field strength at each location and multiplying by the path length.
 
I wanted to avoid doing an integral and instead get an estimate. I suppose that's an unreasonable expectation, though.

Then, this is the integral I set up:
delta V = integral of 0.02 -> 0.06 [(1 / 4*pi*E0) * (2*6e-9*0.004 / y^3) * (<dx, dy, dz>)]

I know:
delta L = <dx, dy, dz>
delta L = 0.04 m

Does <dx, dy, dz> mean I have to derive delta L? If so, how do I derive a constant without getting 0?
 
The path indicated is along one direction, and happens to be along one particular axis, so you can ignore the other components. So your "delta L" is just dy.

I suggest that you perform the integration symbolically first, using variables as the limits of the integration. Plug in numbers at the end.
 
Alright.

Since this is on the y-coordinate I'll exclude the x & z coordinates of the vectors:
delta V = integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s / y^3) dy
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * integral of P1 -> P2 (1 / y^3) dy

In this form, the problem seems to become easier than I expected it to be.
If I recall correctly, the integral of 1 / y^3 is:
-1 / 2 y^2

So the integral of 1 / y^3 from P1 to P2 would be:
[ - 1 / 2 (P1)^2 + 1 / 2 (P2)^2 ]

Plugging this back in:
delta V = 1 / 4 pi E0 * 2 q s * (- 1 / 2 P1^2 + 1 / 2 P2^2)

is this correct so far?
 
Last edited:
I plugged in the numbers and I got -4.8e+2 (-4.8 * 10^2).

The answer was correct.
Thanks for the help, I probably would have over-complicated things without it.
 
Yes, looking good. Carry on!

Edit: Oops! too late! :smile:

Well done.
 
Back
Top