Potential energy functions of a particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy function U(x) for a particle influenced by a conservative force F = (-Ax + Bx^4)i N. The user initially attempts to derive U(x) by integrating the force, suggesting U(x) = -1/2Ax^2 + 1/4Bx^5, but questions the accuracy of their approach. There is confusion regarding the correct integration process, leading to a proposed alternative of U(x) = -1/2Ax^2 + 1/5Bx^5. The need for clarity on the final form of the potential energy function is emphasized. The thread highlights the importance of correctly applying integration to derive potential energy from a variable force.
ramenmeal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A single conservative force acting on a particle varies as Fvec = (-Ax + Bx4)i N, where A and B are constants and x is in meters. Accurately round coefficients to three significant figures.
(a) Calculate the potential energy function U(x) associated with this force, taking U = 0 at x = 0. (Use A, B, and x as appropriate.)

(b) Find the change in potential energy and change in kinetic energy as the particle moves from x = 1.80 m to x = 3.40 m. (Use A, B, and x as appropriate.)

Homework Equations



w = f x d

The Attempt at a Solution



ive only attempted part a since i think i will need it to go on to part b.

w = f x d
f = (-Ax + Bx4)
d = x

PE = (-Ax + Bx^4)x = -Ax^2 + Bx^5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the force is continuously variable over the range of x isn't your U(x) the integral of the Force F(x) and not just the product of x and F(x)?
 
oh yeah.. so should it be

(-1/2)Ax^2 + (1/4)Bx^5 ?

i'm not sure what form my final answer should be.
 
ramenmeal said:
oh yeah.. so should it be

(-1/2)Ax^2 + (1/4)Bx^5 ?

i'm not sure what form my final answer should be.

How about -1/2Ax2 + 1/5Bx5 instead?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top