Potential for Electric Charge over Spherical Shell using Legendre Functions

CaptainMarvel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Electric Charge is distributed over a thin spherical shell with a density which varies in proportion to the value of a single function P_l(cos \theta) at any point on the shell. Show, by using the expansions (2.26) and (2.27) and the orthongonality relations for the Legendre functions, that the potential varies as r^l P_l(cos \theta) at a point (r, \theta) inside the sphere and r^{-(l+1)} P_l(cos \theta) at a point (R, \theta) outside.

Homework Equations



2.26:

\frac {1} {|R-r|} = \frac {1} {R} + \frac {r} {R^2} P_1 + \frac {r^2} {R^3} P_2 + ...


2.27:

P_l(cos \theta_{AB}) = \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} (-1)^{|m|} C_{l,m}(\theta_A , \phi_A) C_{l,-m}(\theta_B , \phi_B)


Orthogonality relations for Legendre Functions:

\int_{-1}^{+1} P_{n}(x) P_{n'}(x) dx = 0 for n \not= n'
\int_{-1}^{+1} P_{n}(x) P_{n'}(x) dx = \frac {2} {2n + 1} for n = n'


The Attempt at a Solution




dV = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \frac {1} {|R-r|} dq

Now consider ring of charge on sphere with area 2 \pi R^2 sin(\theta) d\theta

Therefore charge on the ring is dq = P_l(cos \theta) (2 \pi R^2 sin(\theta) d\theta)

To get the full charge we will have to integrate this ring dq from 0 to pi.

Subbing in using the dq and the relations 2.26 and 2.27:

dV = \frac {1} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} (-1)^{|m|} \frac {r^l} {R^{l+1}} C_{l,m}(\theta_A , \phi_A) C_{l,-m}(\theta_B , \phi_B) P_l(cos \theta) 2 \pi R^2 sin(\theta) d\theta

Since question not reliant on \phi due to spherical symmetry, m = 0 which means all the C_{l,m} become just P_l(cos \theta):

dV = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') P_l(cos \theta) P_l(cos \theta) sin(\theta) d\theta

Now we integrate theta from 0 to pi as mentioned before:

V = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \int_0^{\pi} P_l(cos \theta) P_l(cos \theta) sin(\theta) d\theta

If we use substitution u = cos \theta :

V = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \int_1^{-1} P_l(u) P_l(u) du

Using the orthogonality relation:

V = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \frac {2} {2l +1}

Cleaning up:

V = \frac {1} {\epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \frac {1} {2l +1}

Now I'm stuck though. I have no idea how to get rid of the summation. I'd like to do something let set l = 1 to get rid of the R^{1-l} but I know this must be wrong as the final answer still has ls in it.

Any help would be much appreciated. Am I close or have I totally missed the mark?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it's just my browser but there's a bit of my previous post that is doesn't seem to be able to process correctly. Here are those two lines again:

Now we integrate theta from 0 to pi as mentioned before:

V = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \int_0^{\pi} P_l(cos \theta) P_l(cos \theta) sin(\theta) d\theta

If we use substitution u = cos \theta :

V = \frac {2 \pi} {4 \pi \epsilon_o} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} r^l R^{1-l} P_l(cos \theta') \int_1^{-1} P_l(u) P_l(u) du
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top