Potentiometer or Rheostat: Which is more versatile in circuit design?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ocata
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Rheostats and potentiometers both adjust voltage and current in circuits, but they serve different purposes. A potentiometer provides an additional current path, allowing for a potential divider circuit that can output a range of voltages, while a rheostat only passes load current. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the circuit, such as whether a variable voltage or current limiting is needed. Rheostats require a larger resistance value to effectively limit current, which can lead to issues with overheating. Ultimately, the decision hinges on the desired functionality and efficiency in the circuit design.
Ocata
Messages
198
Reaction score
5
What's the difference between incoporating a rheostat and a potentiometer into a simple circuit?

When you decrease the wiper resistance on a potentiometer, the voltage drop between the potentiometer resistance and load resistance changes so that there's a greater voltage at the load.

Well, when you decrease the wiper resistance in a rheostat, the voltage drop ratio between the rheostat and the load changes as well.

So when you decrease the wiper resistance on either the rheostat or a potentiometer, you allow greater voltage to the load.

When you decrease the wiper resistance on either device, you are also allowing more current to flow to the load.

So with both devices, adjusting the wiper arm adjusts both voltage and current to the source.

The only difference I can see between the two devices is that a rheostat will provide a single path of current from the voltage source through the load while a potentiometer will provide an alternate/additional path for current, some current through the load and some bypassing the load through the parallel arrangement.

Either way, adjusting the wiper of either device will adjust voltage and current (thus power) at the load. So why would one device be preferred over the other in various circuits?

What is the purpose of having the extra path of current in a potentiometer?

What can a potentiometer do that a rheostat can't?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks, I'll ponder that for a while and come back with any further questions of they arise. Thank you
 
Ocata said:
What's the difference between incoporating a rheostat and a potentiometer into a simple circuit?

When you decrease the wiper resistance on a potentiometer, the voltage drop between the potentiometer resistance and load resistance changes so that there's a greater voltage at the load.
It all depends what you want to achieve. It is an 'Engineering Choice" that needs to be made each time.
A Potential Divider Circuit is always passing some current, which may not be handy for a battery operated device. A rheostat only passes the load current.
A Potential Divider can give you a range of voltages out from Zero to the Maximum but a Rheostat will only introduce a certain maximum of series resistance to limit the current supplied to the load.
A rheostat needs to have a large maximum value of resistance (perhaps many times the resistance of the load) if you want to be able to reduce the output current to a low value. That means it may need many turns of thin wire which, when you want to supply a lot of current to the load, the 'top' few turns of resistance wire will be passing a high current through a short length of very thin wire and it may burn out those few turns. Otoh, a potential divider can use fatter wire to pass a high maximum current and yet still give you Zero volts.
Plus various other differences.

The wiper resistance is only relevant when it is comparable with the resistance of the load. It will not affect the output volts from a potential divider if the load is a high resistance.
 
  • Like
Likes Ocata
  • Like
Likes Ocata, Bystander and Tom.G
Just bookmarked yours.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Ocata
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
Back
Top