Power of a Pump draining a flooded basement

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsfan01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Pump
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The power delivered by the pump draining a flooded basement is calculated using the principles of fluid dynamics, specifically the Continuity and Bernoulli equations. The flow rate is determined to be 1.827 kg/s based on a hose radius of 1.01 cm and a velocity of 5.7 m/s. The calculated power output is approximately 52.99 Watts, although a discrepancy arises with another calculation yielding 54.07 Watts. The difference in results is attributed to significant figures used during calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, specifically Continuity and Bernoulli equations.
  • Ability to calculate cross-sectional area from radius measurements.
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its impact on fluid flow.
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of the Continuity equation in fluid dynamics.
  • Study the Bernoulli equation and its implications for fluid flow in various scenarios.
  • Learn about the impact of significant figures on scientific calculations.
  • Explore practical applications of pump power calculations in engineering contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, professionals in fluid mechanics, and anyone involved in designing or analyzing pumping systems.

physicsfan01
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Water is pumped steadily out of a flooded basement at a speed of 5.7m/s, through a uniform hose of radius 1.01cm. The hose passes through a window 2.96m above the waterline. What is the power (in W) delivered by the pump?


Homework Equations



Continuity and Bernoulli principles

The Attempt at a Solution



By using the radius, the cross sectional area is found to be 3.2047 * 10^-4 m^2.
Multiply this by the velocity to find the flow rate I got: .001827 m^3/s or 1.827 kg/s.
Multiply this by gravity (9.8 m/s^2) and the height (2.96m), I got 52.99 Watts.

I don't know where I made a mistake, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is right but I get 54.07 ( how many figures did you carry through the calcs?)
 
I tried 54.07 W but it's not correct either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
19K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K