Prduct of prime (m,m+1) < C(2m,m)

  • Thread starter Thread starter cantorset1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
cantorset1985
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the product of primes between m+1 and 2m is less than C(2m,m)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have that it is less than (2m)!/m! = m!C(2m,m) which is just the product of all of the numbers from m+1 to 2m. Any help is appreciated. Even if you don't know the solution, an idea would be great. (BTW, this isn't a homework problem, I just heard it was true, so being new to the forums, I'm not sure if this is the correct place for this.) Are there any combinatoralists here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let p be a prime in (m+1,2m). Does p divide the numerator of C(2m,m)? What about the denominator? What can you deduce from that?
 
Gokul43201 said:
Let p be a prime in (m+1,2m). Does p divide the numerator of C(2m,m)? What about the denominator? What can you deduce from that?

Ohhhhhhhhh. Wow, that's a lot better than what I was planning to do!

Thanks.
 
Gokul43201 said:
Let p be a prime in (m+1,2m). Does p divide the numerator of C(2m,m)? What about the denominator? What can you deduce from that?

Wait, I thought that I had it, but I don't think I do. Yes, the p divides (2m)! but not m!, so it divides the numerator of C(2m,m) but not the denominator. I need some more help :(
 
cantorset1985 said:
Wait, I thought that I had it, but I don't think I do. Yes, the p divides (2m)! but not m!, so it divides the numerator of C(2m,m) but not the denominator. I need some more help :(

Whoops. I did have it, I just forgot some basic elementary number theory. So, here is my solution:

Let P = the product of primes from (m+1 to 2m). Since (2m!)/(m!) is just the product of all numbers in (m+1,2m) then P | (2m!)/(m!). But, (2m!)/(m!) = m!C(2m,m) so we have that P |m!C(2m,m). Since m < any prime in (m+1,2m) P does not divide m! which means that P must divide C(2m,m), which, in turn imples that P < C(2m,m).

Thanks, that one was driving me crazy.

Also, the starter of this thread is me, through some confusion, I managed to create two accounts, and then use the cantorset account when I meant to use this account. My apologies!
 
Robert1986 said:
Whoops. I did have it, I just forgot some basic elementary number theory. So, here is my solution:

Let P = the product of primes from (m+1 to 2m). Since (2m!)/(m!) is just the product of all numbers in (m+1,2m) then P | (2m!)/(m!). But, (2m!)/(m!) = m!C(2m,m) so we have that P |m!C(2m,m). Since m < any prime in (m+1,2m) P does not divide m! which means that P must divide C(2m,m), which, in turn imples that P < C(2m,m).
That looks good.

Just for completeness, from the previous post:
cantorset1985 said:
Wait, I thought that I had it, but I don't think I do. Yes, the p divides (2m)! but not m!, so it divides the numerator of C(2m,m) but not the denominator. I need some more help :(
If a prime p divides N but not D, and N/D is an integer, then it follows from the prime factorization of N and D, that p must divide N/D.

So every prime, p in (m+1,2m) divides C(2m,m). Therefore, the product, P, must too.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top