Predicting Final Velocities for a Head-On Elastic Collision Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~Fluffy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
In a head-on elastic collision between two bodies of significantly different masses, the smaller mass (m) will bounce back with its initial speed if it collides with a larger mass (M) at rest. Conversely, if M approaches m with speed v_0 while m is at rest, the reference frame of M reveals that m approaches at speed v_0. In this frame, m will bounce back with speed v_0, while M remains stationary. Understanding this reference frame is crucial for predicting final velocities in elastic collisions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing the problem from different reference frames to derive accurate outcomes.
~Fluffy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Consider a head-on, elastic collision between two modies whose masses are m and M, with m << M. It is well known that if m has speed v_0 and M is initially t rest, m will bounce straight back with its speed unchanged, while M will remain at rest (to an excellent approximation). Use this fact to predict the final velocities if M approaches with speed v_0 and m is initially at rest. [Hint: Consider the reference frame attached to M.]

Homework Equations



1. p1 + p2' = p1 + p2'
2. m1*v1 + m2*v2 = m1*v1' + m2*v2' (elastic)
3. m1*v1 + m2*v2 = v' * (m1+m2) (inelastic)

The Attempt at a Solution



I came up with three possible scenarios for the answer. I'm not certain how to consider the reference frame hint into the problem, which is what I'm primarily interested in understanding.

My possible solutions:

1) M bounces off m, similar to how the example in the beginning of the problem.

ViM = V_0, Vim = 0.

VfM = V_0, Vfm = 0.

I don't think that's likely.

2) M stops at collision, all momentum is transferred to m.

ViM = V_0, Vim = 0.

VfM = 0, Vfm = (M / m) * V_0

3) Both m and M move at speed V_0 (roughly). I'm assuming that M is pushing m forward (so same speed).

ViM = V_0, Vim = 0.

VfM = Vfm = (M / (M+m)) * V_0 (rearrangement of equation 3)

My intuition tells me that solution 3 makes the most sense, but I would like to confirm its validity, as well as better understand the reference frame hint in relation to this problem.

Thank you! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the reference frame attached to M, what is the velocity of M? Of m?
 
Disclaimer: new poster to this forum so let me know if this is giving too much help

M is moving at velocity of v_0 in a static reference frame. But from the reference frame of M, it is not moving at all (almost by definition). Instead from M's point of view, it looks like m is approaching M at speed v_0 and M is standing still.

So if m was approaching M with a speed of v_0 the problem explained what would happen; it would bounce off and move away from M with a speed of v_0.

Does this give you a sense of how to use M's reference frame to answer the question?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top