Primary calculation involving the Dirac gama matrices

YSM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
How to work out a calculation involving properties of gama matrices and the dirac equation.
Relevant Equations
showed below
When working on the exercise 3.2 of Peskin's QFT, I find one of the calculating steps confused for me. I read the solution, which is showed in the picture. I just don't understand the boxed part.

I know it involved the Dirac equation, and the solution seems to treat the momentum as a operator, because only in this way can I relate the momentum in the equation with the partial derivative in the Dirac Equation. But I don't think the momentum in the solution of Dirac field serve as an operator.
 

Attachments

  • the calculation.png
    the calculation.png
    25.4 KB · Views: 257
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum in Dirac equation indeed is an operator, in fact: ##p_\mu = i\partial_\mu##. So if that's the only problem, there's your answer.

Edit: Momentum in solutions of Dirac equation is eigenvalue of momentum operator, though they're usually denoted with the same letter.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your answer, but why no minus sign in front of p?
 
It's the sign convention where metric is given by ##diag(1, -1, -1, -1)##. So in that convention the energy operator is given by ##p_0 = i\partial_t## as it should be, and 3-momentum operator is given by ##\textbf{p} = -i\nabla## because ##p^i = -p_i## for spatial indices.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top