Probability - Exponential Function Question

tokuroka
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particular species of mollusk is distributed according to a Poisson process with an unknown density of lambda per cubic meter of water. A sensor is constructed that can detect these species that are within 4 m, and n readings are collected over a year to try and measure lambda. These readings are independent, and so the number of readings that detect a mollusk has the distribution X~Bi(n,p) for some unknown value of p.

p is estimated to be approximately 0.7.

Problem: Let Y be the distance from the sensor to the nearest mollusk.
Show that the c.d.f. of Y is of the form
F(y) = 1- e-(lambda)(4/3pi y3 if y >0.

b) Find the p.d.f. of Y and use it to compute E(Y).

Homework Equations


gamma(4/3) = 0.8929795

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not so much worried about part a), but I tried part b) and I'm getting nowhere. I took the derivative of F(y) to get f(y) (the p.d.f) and got f(y) = 4pi(lambda) y^2(e-(lambda)(4/3 pi*y3, and then for E(Y), I multiplied that by y and took the integral from 0 to infinity of that. I read in my textbook that for the basic proof of expected value, you're supposed to make a substitution for theta = 1/lambda, and then substitute more values to make this integral look like the gamma function. So I substituted x = 4pi/3theta y^3 (to make the power of e = -x) and then what I am left with after simplifying is... the integral from 0 to infinity of e^-x dx... I'm pretty sure that's wrong though... since the problem tells me I should be using the gamma function of 4/3 for something.. Can anyone help me with this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you write dy in terms of dx?
 
yeah I did.. then everything canceled out.
 
Sounds like you didn't multiply by y then. You calculated E(1), not E(y).
 
Ah, okay, I solved it now. Thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top