Projectile Motion: Finding the Maximum Height of a Football

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height of a football kicked at a 38-degree angle with an initial velocity of 27.1 m/s. The initial vertical velocity was calculated correctly, but there was confusion regarding the vertical velocity at maximum height, which is zero. After correcting the calculations, the maximum height was found to be 14 meters, which was accepted by the Lon Capa platform. Additionally, there was a follow-up question regarding the horizontal distance traveled, but the total hang time of 6.5 seconds raised concerns about its feasibility. The participants emphasized the importance of verifying the hang time and the calculations for horizontal distance.
Olivia Carey
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A football is kicked from a tee to start the football game. If the ball is kicked at a 38 degree angle with an initial velocity of 27.1 m/s, Find the maximum height of the football as it flies through the air.

I was using these equations:
Voy = Vo(sine of theta)
Vy = Voy + at
y = 1/2(a)(t^2)

My attempt:
Voy = 27.1(sin38)
Voy = 27.1(.62)
Voy = 16.68

-16.68 = 16.68 + -9.8t
-33.36 = -9.8t
t = 3.4

y = 1/2(-9.8)(3.4^2)
y = -56.644

Lon Capa only wants a less than three digit answer, and it keeps saying that it's wrong. I've tried -56 m, 56 m, -57 m, and 57 m. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Olivia Carey said:
A football is kicked from a tee to start the football game. If the ball is kicked at a 38 degree angle with an initial velocity of 27.1 m/s, Find the maximum height of the football as it flies through the air.

I was using these equations:
Voy = Vo(sine of theta)
Vy = Voy + at
y = 1/2(a)(t^2)

My attempt:
Voy = 27.1(sin38)
Voy = 27.1(.62)
Voy = 16.68
Everything seems OK to this point.
-16.68 = 16.68 + -9.8t
-33.36 = -9.8t
t = 3.4
What's the deal with the velocities here?
What is the vertical velocity of the football when it reaches its max. height above the ground?

Hint: It's not double its initial upward velocity. And why is the vertical velocity negative?
y = 1/2(-9.8)(3.4^2)
y = -56.644

Be careful with signs. Generally, a positive vertical distance means the ball is traveling above the ground.

Lon Capa only wants a less than three digit answer, and it keeps saying that it's wrong. I've tried -56 m, 56 m, -57 m, and 57 m. Please help.
Who is Lon Capa? Is he someone who hangs around your school?
 
  • Like
Likes Olivia Carey
SteamKing said:
Everything seems OK to this point.

What's the deal with the velocities here?
What is the vertical velocity of the football when it reaches its max. height above the ground?

Hint: It's not double its initial upward velocity. And why is the vertical velocity negative?Be careful with signs. Generally, a positive vertical distance means the ball is traveling above the ground.Who is Lon Capa? Is he someone who hangs around your school?

I used the Voy that I got from the first equation, and then set Vy = -(Voy). But maybe that was wrong because I'm not looking for the final velocity of the motion, I'm looking for the velocity of the football at the max point? (is that what you were trying to say?) And the velocity at the max point is 0 m/s, correct?

Lon Capa is a website that my AP Physics teacher uses to give us homework through. You answer the question by typing the answer into a box, and you get about 8 tries. When the box goes green, you're correct, but when it goes red, you're incorrect.
 
Olivia Carey said:
I used the Voy that I got from the first equation, and then set Vy = -(Voy). But maybe that was wrong because I'm not looking for the final velocity of the motion, I'm looking for the velocity of the football at the max point? (is that what you were trying to say?) And the velocity at the max point is 0 m/s, correct?
Yes, the vertical velocity of the ball is zero when it reaches max. height.

Adjust your velocity calculations to obtain the correct time it takes the ball to go from the kicking tee to this height.
 
  • Like
Likes Olivia Carey
SteamKing said:
Yes, the vertical velocity of the ball is zero when it reaches max. height.

Adjust your velocity calculations to obtain the correct time it takes the ball to go from the kicking tee to this height.

I did go back and set Vy = 0 m/s instead of -16.68 m/s in the second equation, and doing that, I got y to eventually equal 14. I entered the answer into Lon Capa and got it right!

There is another part to the question, if you wouldn't mind helping with it.

If the hang time of the ball (total time in the air) is 6.5 seconds, find how far the football goes.

I tried to use x = Vox(t)

Vox = 21.36 (which I found using Vox = Vo(cosine of theta), Vox = 27.1(sin38), Vox = 21.36)
x = 21.36(6.5)
x = 138

When I entered this into Lon Capa, it said it was wrong because the number was too high.
 
Olivia Carey said:
I did go back and set Vy = 0 m/s instead of -16.68 m/s in the second equation, and doing that, I got y to eventually equal 14. I entered the answer into Lon Capa and got it right!

There is another part to the question, if you wouldn't mind helping with it.

If the hang time of the ball (total time in the air) is 6.5 seconds, find how far the football goes.

I tried to use x = Vox(t)

Vox = 21.36 (which I found using Vox = Vo(cosine of theta), Vox = 27.1(sin38), Vox = 21.36)
x = 21.36(6.5)
x = 138

When I entered this into Lon Capa, it said it was wrong because the number was too high.
You've got one typo in your formula for Vox:

Vox = 27.1 * cos 38 = 21.36 m/s

Your arithmetic is correct in finding the distance the ball travels at this horizontal velocity if the total hang time is 6.5 sec. A more reasonable number is about 4.5 sec.

However, since the ball only took about 1.7 sec to reach max. height, it's not clear why the total hang time is almost four times this duration.
You should confirm the total hang time for the ball.

BTW, in actual football play, a hang time of 6.5 sec is almost unheard of, unless Superman is your kicker.

A kicker who is able to kick a football almost the length of a football field and a half would find most stadiums very confining.
 
  • Like
Likes Olivia Carey
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top