Projectile Motion on Escalators: Ice Cream Dilemma Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving projectile motion where ice cream falls from a student on a down escalator towards a professor on an adjacent up escalator. Both escalators are at a 40-degree angle, and the vertical height is 10 meters. The student calculates the time it takes for the ice cream to reach the professor, concluding that it will indeed land on his head. However, there is confusion regarding the vertical height and the relative speed of the ice cream at impact, with a mention of using Galilean transformation for further calculations. Clarification is sought on certain variables used in the equations, particularly the value of 0.400, which was not defined in the initial problem statement.
Nax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are at the mall on the top step of a down escalator when you lean over laterally to see your 1.8 m tall physics professor on the bottom step of the adjacent up escalator. Unfortunately, the ice cream you hold in your hand falls out of its cone as you lean. The two escalators have identical angles of 40 degrees with the horizontal, a vertical height of 10 m. Will the ice cream land on your professor's head? Explain. If it does land on his head, at what time and at what vertical height does that happen? What is the relative speed of the ice cream with respect to the head at the time of impact?

Homework Equations



y0i+vy0it-1/2gt^2
y0p+vy0pt


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm able to find time:

10.0-(0.400)sin(40)(t)-1/2(9.81)t^2=1.80+(0.400)sin(40)(t)
-4.905t^2-0.25115t+10.0 = 0.25115t+1.8
-4.905t^2-0.51423t+8.2 = 0
(-4.905t^2-0.51423t+8.2)*-1 = 0 * -1
4.905t^2+0.51423t-8.2 = 0

t = -b +/1 sqrt ( b^2 - 4 ac) / 2a
t = ((-0.51423 +/- sqrt( (0.51423)^2 - 4(4.905) (-8.2) ) / (4.905)*2
t = (-0.51423 +/- 12.694425)/9.81

(-)

t = -13.20866/9.81
t = -1.35

(+)

t= 12.18019525/9.81
t= 1.24

------

I'm not sure how to find the vertical height and relative speed with respect to the head at the time of impact. Insight would be greatly appreciated, thank you. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know we're supposed to make use of a Galilean transformation, but I'm not sure how...
 
[STRIKE]the question gave you the information, that both professor, ice-cream with student is on escalator. Its pretty safe to assume they have same horizontal velocity (magnitude). So, the answer is yes it will land on professor's head!...This should give you some insight![/STRIKE]

I guess I overlooked some things

Nax said:
I'm able to find time:

10.0-(0.400)sin(40)(t)-1/2(9.81)t^2=1.80+(0.400)sin(40)(t)
-4.905t^2-0.25115t+10.0 = 0.25115t+1.8
-4.905t^2-0.51423t+8.2 = 0
(-4.905t^2-0.51423t+8.2)*-1 = 0 * -1
4.905t^2+0.51423t-8.2 = 0

what is this value (0.400)?...You haven't mentioned anything about it in your question.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top