Is My Calculation of 81.48 Meters in Projectile Motion Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of a calculation for projectile motion, specifically questioning the reported height of 81.48 meters. It emphasizes the importance of breaking the problem into segments and suggests that the initial approach may be flawed due to incorrect vertical displacement calculations. The recommendation is made to avoid plugging in numbers too early in the process, advocating for a symbolic approach to maintain clarity and check for errors. Additionally, the need for better organization in presenting the work is highlighted to improve understanding. Overall, the conversation stresses the importance of methodical problem-solving in physics calculations.
Kingyou123
Messages
98
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Check for first upload

Homework Equations


I wrote them down in my attempt at a solution

The Attempt at a Solution


Second upload, 81.48 meters high seems really wrong to me...
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    23.9 KB · Views: 396
  • 20150929_214123.jpg
    20150929_214123.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 326
Physics news on Phys.org
As an aside, looking at your work is hard to follow. I think you could work on your organizational skills and hold off a bit more before plugging in numbers.

Your height at 95 meters downrange is incorrect, why don't we break this problem into segments. What are you trying to find initially to solve this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes Kingyou123
Since the launch angle is 45 degrees, you can make use of the fact that vx = vy for the components of initial velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Kingyou123
The formula you quote at the end of line 6 (d= etc.) is only valid when there is no net vertical displacement.
I heartily endorse Student100's advice to avoid plugging in numbers until the very end. Work the algebra entirely symbolically. Much easier to follow, to check for dimensional consistency, to spot algebraic mistakes...
 
  • Like
Likes Kingyou123

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Find Projectile Flight Time Given Only Maximum Height
Replies
4
Views
2K
Help with science project to launch a projectile
Replies
38
Views
6K
Find the height of a lamp based on the velocities of projectiles
Replies
40
Views
2K
How should I calculate the distance D with two different motions?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Circular motion to projectile motion
Replies
18
Views
2K
Launching a Projectile with Air Resistance
Replies
13
Views
3K
Initial Position Discrepancy Involving Fluid Resistance
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why does this not work? Projectile Motion problem for Dynamics Class
Replies
19
Views
3K
How Do You Solve a Projectile Motion Problem?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Investigating Motion of Rockets & Satellites: Advanced Mechanics Depth Study
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top